Difference between revisions of "Mechadense's Wiki about Atomically Precise Manufacturing"
(added new patreon banner to the top) |
(→Far term target: added link to Block diagram of a gem-gum on-chip factory and improved on section (added sub-headlines)) |
||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
[[File:ProductiveNanosystemsMainScreencap.jpg|400px|thumb|right|Screen capture from the concept animation video: "[[Productive Nanosystems From molecules to superproducts]]" showing several proposed processing stages compressed into just one single image. This is conceptual.]] | [[File:ProductiveNanosystemsMainScreencap.jpg|400px|thumb|right|Screen capture from the concept animation video: "[[Productive Nanosystems From molecules to superproducts]]" showing several proposed processing stages compressed into just one single image. This is conceptual.]] | ||
− | |||
On this wiki the shorthand '''"gem-gum technology"''' will be used to refer to the '''far term target'''.<br> | On this wiki the shorthand '''"gem-gum technology"''' will be used to refer to the '''far term target'''.<br> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
---- | ---- | ||
− | ''' | + | '''The development target are "[[gemstone metamaterial on-chip factories]]".''' <br> |
The associated technology (what they are made out of and what they make) is "[[gemstone metamaterial technology]]". <br> | The associated technology (what they are made out of and what they make) is "[[gemstone metamaterial technology]]". <br> | ||
The best visualization of the proposed internal workings of a [[gem-gum factory]] in existence so far is<br> | The best visualization of the proposed internal workings of a [[gem-gum factory]] in existence so far is<br> | ||
− | '''the concept animation video: [[Productive Nanosystems From molecules to superproducts]]''' | + | '''the concept animation video: [[Productive Nanosystems From molecules to superproducts]]'''<br> |
− | --- | + | This features concrete example geometries. |
− | '''Why "gem-gum"?''' See: [[Defining traits of gem-gum | + | |
+ | Not specifying any concrete geometries a good overview over the necessary innards of a [[gem-gum factory]] can be found here:<br> | ||
+ | '''[[Block diagram of a gem-gum on-chip factory]]''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Choice of terminology === | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Why "gem-gum"?''' See: [[Defining traits of gem-gum-tec]]. In brief: | ||
* The '''"gem"''' stands stands for gemstone being the base material | * The '''"gem"''' stands stands for gemstone being the base material | ||
− | * The '''"gum"''' stands for rubber like | + | * The '''"gum"''' stands for rubber like flexibility – one of many possible properties that the gemstone base material attains by nanostructuring it into a [[mechanical metamaterial]] |
− | + | ||
+ | <small>''A technically accurate but unwieldy long description of the far term target of APM would be:</small> <br> | ||
+ | <small>"atomically resolving gemstone based metamaterial manufacturing and technology"''</small> | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Microcomponent recomposers === | ||
+ | |||
[[Microcomponent recomposer]]s also belong to [[gemstone metamaterial technology]]. <br> | [[Microcomponent recomposer]]s also belong to [[gemstone metamaterial technology]]. <br> | ||
− | These would be kind of deliberately incomplete [[gemstone metamaterial on-chip factories]]. | + | These would be kind of deliberately incomplete [[gemstone metamaterial on-chip factories]] becase <nr>. |
− | -- | + | They'd only recompose [[microcomponents]] which already have been produced. |
+ | |||
+ | === Scope of "gemstone metamaterial technology" (or "gem-gum-tech" for short) === | ||
+ | |||
On this wiki to "[[gemstone metamaterial technology]]" is sometimes referred to with: | On this wiki to "[[gemstone metamaterial technology]]" is sometimes referred to with: | ||
* technology level [[Technology level III|III]]. <br> | * technology level [[Technology level III|III]]. <br> |
Revision as of 17:21, 7 February 2022
Language: en | Sprache: de |
Support this wiki via Patreon. 🙏 |
The far term target
The personal gem gum factory is:
The personal gem gum factory makes:
|
The existence of a personal fabricator will have profound impact human society on a global scale.
The basis for such a personal fabricator - the atomically precise manufacturing (APM) technology - is beginning to be figured out today.
Dodge the trapdoors
First off: Let's get the major obstacles out of the way.
- There are no "nanobots" here!
Check the info pages "Prime distractions" and "No nanobots". - Macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale?! (machinery like this)
It's well known, that there are several severe concerns regarding this idea. And for very good reasons.
Less known is, that all of those major concerns have been considered in quite some detail with rather surprising results.
Check out the main article discussing the concerns here:
Macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale
- Yes, lifes nanomachinery (molecular biology) does NOT constitute a feasibility proof of the targeted kind of technology.
But it does not constitute an infeasibility proof either. For details see: "Nature does it differently".
What does provide the very high confidence in feasibility is low level exploratory engineering applied without compromises.
Additionally there are successful experimental demonstrations of manipulation of single atoms. Repeatable, precise, with strong covalent bonds, and at decently high temperatures ("decently high" meaning: no liquid helium involved). Plus there's a clear path how to speed this up to the necessary operations frequencies. Namely by scaling down the placement mechanisms. - No, making every structure permitted by physical law is NOT the goal here. Quite the contrary actually. What we want is to cheat and make it seem as if we could. It's even encoded in the name that this wiki uses to refer to the far term target. Specifically in the "gem" and "gum" parts in "gem-gum-tec". For details check out: "The defining traits of gem-gum-tec" and "Every structure permissible by physical law".
- No, using soft nanomachinery to bootstrap stiff nanomachinery is not an abandonment of principles. It just might be a more practical approach to get to the target faster. See: "Pathways".
- No, nanoscale physics and quantum mechanics is not inherently incomprehensible.
It is very possible, satisfying, and useful to develop an intuitive feel for these things.
What APM is not
While early APM may have overlap with these areas the far term goals are very different.
- Soft nanomachines: APM is all about targeting stiffness / stiff nanomachines / "hard" nanomachines.
Nonetheless soft nanomachines can be very useful in the bootstrapping process.
Note though, that self assembly (useful in bootstrapping) does not essentially rely on a lack of stiffness aka softness.
There are experiments with hierarchical self assembly of structural DNA nanotechnology that have clearly demonstrated this
(wiki-TODO: add reference). - Molecular biology: One main far term target in molecular biology is a complete reverse engineering of natures nanomachinery for grand improvements in medicine. This is strongly unrelated to the far term target of APM. A particular example where the interests diverge: The very difficult folding problem for natural proteins versus the relatively simple de-novo-protein-design for artificial nanomachinery.
- Synthetic biology: The far term targets of this research is the recreation and expansion of the nanomachinery of life. It goes pretty much 180° in the opposite direction of APM.
(Not to say that this research is not valuable in its own right. Its far term targets are just maximally unrelated to R&D efforts targeting APM)
Main article: "Brownian technology path"
What APM actually is
APM is basically the capability of manufacturing products such that the atoms they are constituted of link (bind) to each other in "exactly" the way one desires them to. Since "absolute exactness" in other words "making no errors ever" is a fundamental physical impossibility one just aims for extremely low error rates. On the long run error rates comparable to the bit-error-rates one can find in todays digital data processing systems.
Why should the far term target of APM (gemstone metamaterial technology) even work?
Because there is exceptional theoretical and good experimental evidence that it will:
For details see: Why gemstone metamaterial technology should work in brief
Gemstone metamaterial technology is the far term target of APM. More on that further down.
APM in the near term and APM in the far term
See main article: Near term and far term.
Nearer term targets
On this wiki "atomically precise manufacturing" (or APM) will be interpreted in a wider sense.
Including both earlier precursor systems in the near term and the targeted later systems in the far term.
Specifically this may include:
- Modular molecular composite nanosystems (MMCNs)
- Foldamer printers
- Technology level: 0, I, (and maybe II)
Far term target
On this wiki the shorthand "gem-gum technology" will be used to refer to the far term target.
The development target are "gemstone metamaterial on-chip factories".
The associated technology (what they are made out of and what they make) is "gemstone metamaterial technology".
The best visualization of the proposed internal workings of a gem-gum factory in existence so far is
the concept animation video: Productive Nanosystems From molecules to superproducts
This features concrete example geometries.
Not specifying any concrete geometries a good overview over the necessary innards of a gem-gum factory can be found here:
Block diagram of a gem-gum on-chip factory
Choice of terminology
Why "gem-gum"? See: Defining traits of gem-gum-tec. In brief:
- The "gem" stands stands for gemstone being the base material
- The "gum" stands for rubber like flexibility – one of many possible properties that the gemstone base material attains by nanostructuring it into a mechanical metamaterial
A technically accurate but unwieldy long description of the far term target of APM would be:
"atomically resolving gemstone based metamaterial manufacturing and technology"
Microcomponent recomposers
Microcomponent recomposers also belong to gemstone metamaterial technology.
These would be kind of deliberately incomplete gemstone metamaterial on-chip factories becase <nr>.
They'd only recompose microcomponents which already have been produced.
Scope of "gemstone metamaterial technology" (or "gem-gum-tech" for short)
On this wiki to "gemstone metamaterial technology" is sometimes referred to with:
- technology level III.
- technology level II (solution phase synthesizable gemstones) may or may not be included.
Take a tour
Take a guided tour: (Work in progress. Please excuse the links dangling into construction sites.)
Or take a shortcut directly from here:
What, Why, How, When
DEFINITION: | About APM | What APM is not and what it is. |
MOTIVATION: | Reasons for APM | Why we need APM. |
OBSTACLES: | conceptual and institutional challenges | What impedes progress towards APM. |
APPROACH: | Pathways to advanced APM | How we get to advanced APM. |
PROGRESSION: | Time till advanced APM | When we will get to advanced APM? |
Also there are:
- the goals of this wiki
- this wiki's impressum
- related 3D printing projects: educational illustration of various principles; ReChain project; RepRec project
Misc:
- Intro: Here is an old version of the landing page. Containing a detailed introduction to atomically precise manufacturing as a whole. (warning, lots of text)
What needs to be done to make it happen
See: Where to start targeted development for some suggestions.
Links
Technical feasibility analysis
There is (after 29 years and counting) still only one focused and aggregated technical feasibility analysis of advanced APM (referring to gemstone metamaterial APM here) available as of the day of writing (2020-11-08). This is Eric Drexlers 1991 MIT Dissertation and the book "Nanosystems" which basically is a cleaned up version of the dissertation.
- via MIT libraries: [2]
- via academia.edu [3]
- via internet archive of the authors former homepage: [4]
This analysis is still the most important technical work in this field alone simply because it is still the only one. If the reader is not afraid of a bit more technical reading and want's to get well past a mere superficial understanding then this is a highly suggested read. Note that the topics tackled in the analysis are of timeless nature so the analysis hasn't gone outdated in these past 29 (and counting) years.
Webpages
- Forum
- Foresight Institute: Nanotechnology
- Institute for Molecular Manufacturing
- Nanofactory Collaboration
- Disquisition 2013 "Nano-solutions for the 21st century: Unleashing the fourth technological revolution"
- Zyvex's definition of APM
- Other sites
Brief introduction videos
- Productive Nanosystems From molecules to superproducts ~ A concept video visualizing the results found in the book Nanosystems
- Nanotube TV (von Nanotechnology Industries) (2016-10)
- Nanotechnology: the big picture with Dr Eric Drexler and Dr Sonia Trigueros (2016-01-28)
- Transforming the Material Basis of Civilization | Eric Drexler | TEDxISTAlameda (2015-11-16)
- Chris Phoenix on Molecular Manufacturing (2014-09?) (alternative 2)(alternative1) Nanotechnologist (older dead link)
- Dr Eric Drexler - Remaking the 21st Century (2014-01-23) long! 1h 14min
- Video of oxford talk (2014-01-22): Eric K. Drexler speaks about his new book "Radical Abundance"
- John Randall: "Atomically Precise Manufacturing" at Foresight Technical Conference 2013
Illuminating Atomic Precision: Foresight Technical Conference January 2013 - Fully Printed (2010-06) - Note: Diamondoid nanofactories will look and work differently and won't produce food.
- Ralph Merkle - An introduction to Molecular Nanotechnology (2009-11)
- presentation by Phillip Moriarty (2009-09):
SENS4 - Molecular Nanotechnology in the Real World: How Feasible is a Nanofactory?
(1/4) - (2/4) - (3/4) - (4/4) - Nottingham Nanotechnology debate (2005-08-24):
(recording of the whole debate)
Unfortunately videos got deleted :(
(1/7) - (2/7) - (3/7) - (4/7) - (5/7) - (6/7) - (7/7) -- repaired links (7/7)
- BBC Horizon Nanoutopia (1995)(broken link#2) (older broken link) - Note: The term "nanotechnology" turned out to be to unspecific and the assembler concept is now superseded by the nanofactory concept. The complexity of a nanofactory will be akin to modern day computer chips.
Wikipedia pages
- Atomically precise manufacturing
- Productive nanosystems
- Molecular nanotechnology
- Molecular assembler -> Nanofactories
- Mechanosynthesis -> Diamond mechanosynthesis
Locally hosted files
- Slides from the talk the apm-wiki site admin gave at the austrian "linuxwochen" event: slides-pdf-file