Revision as of 17:03, 20 December 2016

in the future we will build with gemstones

moissanite aka silicon carbide (SiC) - a typical diamondoid material - without impurities it would be transparent like diamond - the silicon makes this material fireproof in bulk blocks but also inhibits the possibility to intentionally burn it up completely to gasses since - it partly turns into glassy slack or fly ash instead

Diamondoid materials encompass all materials that:

• have their atoms not moving around on their surfaces at room temperature but have them stay where they are for decades to eons. (they do not diffuse)
• are stiff enough to keep their shape under thermal movement at room temperature (this excludes all of todays plastic polymeres)
• have dense three dimensional networks of covalent bonds like gemstones - (short bond loops prevent rotations around single bonds)
• (not necessarily but desirable) do not react or dissolve in water

Diamondoid materials include many Neo-polymorphic compounds that currently can't be produced.

The main reason why diamondoid materials are the material of choice for diamondoid molecular elements DMEs (the constituents of artificial advanced AP systems) is that they do not jitter and wobble or even diffuse away while they are built with stiff manipulators (a blind process that cant see or correct errors).

Also products out of diamondoid materials can be made so that they only have one to a few tightly controlled degrees of freedome. This way one can test one action at a time. A common approach to gain engineering with fast progress.

In contrast a systems design that poses the necessity for scientific entangling of convoluted relationships is usually considered bad. Natural nanosystems (e.g. living cells) are like this because of random incremental evolution in small steps without any far lookahead. In this regard one obviously shouldn't copy from nature.

Possible alternatives for the term diamondoid: gem-like, gemstone-like, gemstoneoid, gemoid

Carbons versatility

By the time of writing (2014) and the time of last review (2015) carbon is the only building material for which extensive studies about tooltip chemistry have been undertaken.
Note that just by structuring carbon (and adding a bit hydrogen as passivation agent) many material properties will be archivable. This is because diamondoid materials go far beyond the known allotropes and thermodynamically stable phases. They extend into the set of low level and high level metamaterials.

Low level metamarterials include very stable patterns that are highly ordered. Those patterns may include vacancies and may have periods of repitition of arbitrary length. Their structural alterations are small enough to influence properties that originate at such low size levels e.g. chemical electrical magnetical and other properties (especially relevant for the non mechanical technology path). A simple example of a low level metamaterial is when donation atoms are embedded in a checkerboard or other exactly periodic pattern. The set of sufficiently metastable low level metamaterials is significantly bigger than the set of designed materials that can today (2014) be cooked together by macroscopic means. This set of designed materials favours random mixing because they require very restrictive good thermodynamic accessibility.

The distinction between low level metamaterials and high level metamaterials may be difficult in some cases. Conventially doped semiconductors for example are not called metamaterials.

Beyond carbon from acetylene and methane many further studies are needed most importantly:

• machanosynthetic splitting of water for scavenging usable oxygen
• direct splitting of oxygen
• splitting of nitrogen - artificial and different to current natural or industrial methods of nitrogen fixation.
• splitting of carbon dioxide
• fluorine and the nonmetal elements of the third period

Carbon nanotubes can replace the scarce element copper for electrical cables.

Diamondoid compounds

Please keep in mind that all compounds we know of today are only those few we can create by mixing and cooking various elements or preproduced compounds together. With mechanosynthesis many more will be accessible. Although they're not in a thermodynamic minimum they'll be very stable at room temperature. A recent example is the theoretical prediction of the stability of graphitic pentagonal carbon sheets with the so called cairo pattern. The "few" compounds we can create by mixing and cooking them together are all the minerals that are documented today. These will be surveyed here. Many more meta-stable compounds will become mechanosynthesizable though for most applications the allotropes of carbon used in their high level metamaterial configurations alone will suffice.

Taking the rock forming mineral quartz one finds several natural polymorphs - the "quartz group" beyond those natural polymorphs Neo-polymorphs of SiO₂ will be accessible which are (albeit their deviation from thermodynamic equilibrium) very stable but not accessible today.

pseudo phase diagrams

Lists of potential structural compounds

early materials

• Diamondoid biominerals ... compounds that are synthesizable under solution are of interest for technology level II to bridge the gap between technology level I and III.

pure elements

• C carbon sp3 network allotropes: diamond, diamonds known properties, lonsdaleite; sp2 allotropes: fullerenes, graphitic networks
• Si silicon (also cubic or hexagonal)
• B ~four allotropes of elementar boron (may be difficult to use)
• P & S allotropes of phosphorus and sulfur (may be difficult to use because of what follows below)

some classifications: (a high dimensional overlapping space of possibilities)

• Binary diamondoid compounds
• Diamondoid compounds that contain (partially abundant) s-block metals
• ternary and higher diamondoid compounds
• cubic garnets
• refractory materials

• diamondoid compounds containing elements of the 13th group
• high pressure modifications
• electrically conductive diamondoid compounds

issues with more complex compounds

Metamaterials made from the basic diamondoid materials are able to emulate a lot of physical properties.
Further binary ternary or higher diamondoid materials can complicate engineering design due to:

• low symmetry in their crystal structure - see: isotropy of materials
• porousness due to bridge bonding like present in all salts of oxoacids X-O-X (X can be e.g. Si,Al,P,...) and some other compounds
• complex or polar surface structure which may be difficult to passivate
• lack of tensile strength
• ...

thus they may predominantly find use for special applications like as:

• slowly water dissolvable materials for better biodegradability
• laser gain materials
• infill materials
• materials with special electrical magetical or other exotic non high level emulatable properties
• ...

In the following classifications section you'll find a lot of links to wikipedia articles about gem-grade minerals with very beautiful pictures. Please note that the colors you see are in most of the cases due to small impurities and not inherent to the minerals themselves. Most (electrically non conductive) minerals will be completely transparent when built defect and impurity free. An extreme example is silicon carbide known as a black solid but in single crystalline form it's called mossianite and completely transparent. Color should be intentionally addable by mechanosynthetic sparse checkerboard dotation.

compounds which contain relatively scarce elements

Those may be useful in the lower technology levels or special tooltip chemistry where only very small amounts are needed (e.g. germaium containing tips).

• molybdenium oxide structures
• germanium compounds
• ... many more

Sources for elements

Carbon is planned to be drawn from [ethyne] more commonly known as the welding gas acetylene. It has the advantage of a triple bond that when partly split up provides four unpassivated bonds and it's carrying around a minimal amount of hydrogen. Since DMEs are compact and crystal like they have a lot less surface than the source molecules and thus require a lot less hydrogen passivation. Ethyne cant be delivered in highly compressed gasseous form since it explosively decomposes. It is hardly soluble in water but well soluble in acetone ethanol or dimethylformamide. Ethyne can be manufactured by the partial combustion of methane and thus potentially be gained from renewable resources.

If one looks at the most common or most easily accessible elements and their simplest compounds one finds a list of potential structural building materials:
Link to a graphic of the most common elements in the earths crust from Wikimedia Commons.

Most easily accessible are nitrogen oxygen and argon since they can direcly be drawn from the atmosphere.
To investigate:

• Means for filtering/capturing N₂ and O₂ each selectively from the atmosphere.
• Mechanosynthetic tooltips and manipulations to gain reactive moieties out captured N₂ and O₂.

drawn from the atmosphere

Oxygen and nitrogen rich compounds like SiO₂ and Si₃N₄ are interesting because more than half of this material can be drawn directly from the atmosphere. When atmospheric carbon dioxide is used carbon allotropes and β-C₃N₄ can be drawn 100% from the air.

back to the atmosphere

When burning diamondoid materials (hopefully in a smart way - thus only in traces - see recycling) it strongly depends on the type of chosen material whether they convert to gasses or just reform to a glassy slag. In the latter case it will be more difficult to recover the elements in pure form. The rough rule is: When heated under oxygen mainly carbon based materials burn up almost completely while silicon or metal oxide based materials just melt to a slag. Everything in between could be possible. Certain combinations of elements can become dangerous when burned together as we know from the PVC dioxine problem.

Chlorine

Chlorine could be drawn from common salt leaving behind sodium. To get this residual into a nonreactive environmentally acceptable form that could be used as structural material rather than just constituting waste one could chose from sodium minerals. To prefer are compounds with no crystal water and simple formulas with only elements of high importance for APM (that is which we are likely to gain control of soon after reaching technology level III) like e.g. jadeite and further ones to find.

The 13th group

Elements of the 13th group (the boron group) are special in that they can form electron deficiency bonds.

If elements of this group come into play (are used in DMEs) the view of atoms as construction blocks with a fixed number of connection points breaks down. E.g. when boron comes in contact with nitrogen the lone pair of nitrogen plucks into the electron deficient hull of boron making the two atoms more behave like two four valenced carbon atoms (with a little polar/ionic character). Prime example: ammonia borane. This is not yet handeled correctly by the software Nanoengineer-1 so it is advised to refrain from using 13th group elements for DME design for now.

In high quanities both solvated aluminum and boron compounds are alien to human and natural biology. Intake can lead to bad or unknown effects. Thus one might refrain from using strongly water soluble compounds of 13th group elements. Some information can be found here: boron and water (de); aluminum and water (de)

In tooltip chemistry boron and aluminum may be useful as tool-tips for the handling of atoms with almost full electron shells like oxygen fluorine sulfur and chlorine effectively increasing their normally low bond number. (To verify!)

Related

• Semi diamondoid structures
• Find diamondoid compounds by the elements they contain.

External links

• Wikipedia has its own page about diamondoid materials. See here: [1]

Todo

• add some beautiful images of minerals in their gem grade form
• pseuso phase diagrams
• add nanosystems definition of "diamondoid"