Difference between revisions of "Bootstrapping methods for productive nanosystems"
From apm
(added section == Bottom up ==) |
(→Bottom up: added SDN example) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
There are at least three independent orthogonal axes where technological capability can be judged by and scaled along. These are: | There are at least three independent orthogonal axes where technological capability can be judged by and scaled along. These are: | ||
− | * Convergent selfassembly levels | + | * Convergent selfassembly levels <br>(like experimentally demonstrated in [[SDN]]: bricks to blocks then blocks to multiblocks) |
− | * Material stiffness (SDN, protein, stiffer stuff) | + | * Material stiffness <br>([[SDN]], protein, stiffer stuff) |
* Degree of introduction of positional assembly aspects | * Degree of introduction of positional assembly aspects | ||
Revision as of 17:02, 26 March 2021
Available methods for getting towards the necessary parallelity to produce macroscopic amounts of products
- bottom up: fully parallel (and hierarchical) self assembly of atomically precise chemically pre-produced building blocks
- top down: conventional photolithographic methods (MEMs)
- exponential assembly (the glue in the middle?)
- compact self replication (outdated)
- self emerging highly distributed self-replicative capabilities
Bottom up
There are at least three independent orthogonal axes where technological capability can be judged by and scaled along. These are:
- Convergent selfassembly levels
(like experimentally demonstrated in SDN: bricks to blocks then blocks to multiblocks) - Material stiffness
(SDN, protein, stiffer stuff) - Degree of introduction of positional assembly aspects
See: Thermally driven assembly