Difference between revisions of "Microcomponent maintenance microbot"
(added link to * Mobile nanoscale robotic device) |
(→Related: added link to * Legged mobility -- expanded on wikitodo) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* [[Self repair]] | * [[Self repair]] | ||
* [[Mobile nanoscale robotic device]] | * [[Mobile nanoscale robotic device]] | ||
| − | * {{wikitodo| | + | * [[Legged mobility]] |
| + | |||
| + | {{wikitodo|Eventually split-off discussion of nanorobotic devices for testing for product functionality status.}} | ||
Revision as of 14:46, 18 May 2021
Diamondoid AP products made out of microcomponents can potentially be taken apart again to do self repair or system upgrades. If the exchange of microcomponents is done while the system is not active it's microcomponents can be disassembled by the upper assembly levels of a compatible nanofactory or microcomponent recomposer device but if the exchange shall be done while the system is running or without disassembling the whole system mechanisms for transport of microcomponents must be present.
Microcomponent maintainance units - small diamondoid AP products out of a single or multiple microcomponents - featuring legged mobility would be a possibility to provide this mobility. They could e.g. hold onto a simple cubic crystal lattice with eight arms and move from interstitial point to interstitial point by arm extension or shrinkage. Further manipulators would allow them to unlock remove and transport microcomponents. For high throughputs a fractal channel design will be necessary but for self repair of the usually low damage rates a simple cartesian channel system will suffice in most practical cases.
Note that microcomponent maintainance units do not have to have such high "intelligence" (fluid dynamics emulation) like (speculative) utility fog has to have. Also they have no means for self replication like the outdated concept of molecular assemblers.
Related
A macroscopic device with the same restrictions on capabilities is the microcomponent recomposer device.
It also cannot do mechanosynthesis. But the much more space in the macroscopic device still gives the potential to greater capabilities.
Multidevice microcomponent recomposer device systems should come a little closer in capability the macroscopic microcomponent maintainence units.
(wiki-TODO: Eventually split-off discussion of nanorobotic devices for testing for product functionality status.)
