Difference between revisions of "Surface interface"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
m (internal link correction)
m
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
For larger areas correct internal [[atomic precision|atomically precise]] bond forming may be an issue [Todo: include reference]  
 
For larger areas correct internal [[atomic precision|atomically precise]] bond forming may be an issue [Todo: include reference]  
For the best results one can begin to form the bonds from one side then rotating the two parts around the location of the first formed bond(s) closing the remaining wedge of open space in a slowing down scissoring motion and finally zipping the radicals together at a constant rate.
+
For the best results one can begin to form the bonds from one side then rotating the two parts around the location of the first formed bond(s) closing the remaining wedge of open space in a slowing down scissoring motion while zipping the radicals together at a constant rate.
  
 
For some crystallographic surfaces of diamond [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_reconstruction surface reconstruction] is an issue. This has been analyzed ['''Todo:''' add link to nanodiamond study]. The surface reconstuctions that are frequently observed today are often caused by heating the sample way above ambient temperature.
 
For some crystallographic surfaces of diamond [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_reconstruction surface reconstruction] is an issue. This has been analyzed ['''Todo:''' add link to nanodiamond study]. The surface reconstuctions that are frequently observed today are often caused by heating the sample way above ambient temperature.

Revision as of 10:40, 25 January 2014

The bright red dots in groups of seven are open bonds forming four surface interfaces (some occluded) on this tetrahedric DMSE.

The term surface interfaces (or short sinterfaces) may be used for the unpassivated surfaces of DMSEs (of technology level III). Unpassivated means that open unsaturated bonds (chemical radicals) are present. Those act (in practical terms) simply as androgynous connection poiunts. To have anything to assemble for each surface interface of an DMSE there muts be at least one type of DMSE that provides at least one complementary surface interface. Since the formed bonds are indistinguishable from the bonds within the solid merging/welding together of two complementary sintefaces is an irreversible process and leaves a seamless joint. When trying to break the sinterface apart again some random fracture will occur.

For larger areas correct internal atomically precise bond forming may be an issue [Todo: include reference] For the best results one can begin to form the bonds from one side then rotating the two parts around the location of the first formed bond(s) closing the remaining wedge of open space in a slowing down scissoring motion while zipping the radicals together at a constant rate.

For some crystallographic surfaces of diamond surface reconstruction is an issue. This has been analyzed [Todo: add link to nanodiamond study]. The surface reconstuctions that are frequently observed today are often caused by heating the sample way above ambient temperature. When building DMSEs Mechanosynthesis can be done slow enough that such extreme heating does not occur. This may allow for the creation of more unstable crystallographic surfaces. Wether to use them is another question.

Sidenote: If a sinterface lies on a single plane all the bond directions are normal to the plane and the sinterface has at least twofold rotational symmetry then the complementary surface is identical to the original.

Sparse sinterfaces designed to have only few covalent connection points per area and conical widening behind them can be taken apart reversibly. microcomponents containing such structures need to be moved back into vacuum down to assembly level II if those joints are ought tpo be disassembled.