Difference between revisions of "Superelasticity"
m (wiki-todo => wikitodo) |
(added headlines; added distinction to pseudoelasticity) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{site specific term}} | {{site specific term}} | ||
| − | The term ''' | + | The term '''gemstone superelasticity''' will be used on this wiki for the unusually high bendability/strainability of flawless nanoscale gemstone machine parts manufactured by advanced forms of [[mechanosynthesis]]. In short: The unusually high bendability of [[Crystolecule]]s. |
| + | |||
| + | (Not to confuse with Pseudoelasticity [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoelasticity] e.g. found in Nitinol.) | ||
The basic building blocks for gemstone based nanomachinery are [[Crystolecule]]s. | The basic building blocks for gemstone based nanomachinery are [[Crystolecule]]s. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
Such high strains are especially not possible with natural gemstones or todays (2018) thermodynamically produced synthetic gemstones. | Such high strains are especially not possible with natural gemstones or todays (2018) thermodynamically produced synthetic gemstones. | ||
| + | == Retaining high straibanility to the macroscale == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Mechanosynthesized macroscopic slabs of gemstones (which may be quite a bit more difficult to make than crystolecules btw {{wikitodo|elaborate}}) may start out flawless but very quickly acquire flaws from all kinds of radiation (UV, gamma, ...) even when heavily shielded (neutrinos). | ||
| + | |||
| + | To retain extreme strainability as much as possible to the macroscale | ||
| + | one can start to build things by interlocking crystolecules in smart ways (see: [[Shape locking]]). | ||
| + | Cracks of broken crystloecules are instantly stopped and can't propagate any further. | ||
| − | + | == Measuring Superelasticity == | |
Very small crystals can have flawless structure even when produced thermodynamically today. | Very small crystals can have flawless structure even when produced thermodynamically today. | ||
| − | This may provide a way to test superelasticity experimentally today. | + | This may provide a way to test superelasticity experimentally today. But this seems difficult. |
| − | But this seems difficult. | + | For compression maybe one could clamp a crystal with a super-hard monocrystalline nanoscale vice? |
| − | For compression maybe clamp a crystal with a | + | But what would one do for tension? {{Todo|check if there where experiments testing superelasticity}} |
| − | (Sidenote: Thermodynamic synthesis of nanoscale gemstones gives almost no control of outer shape, internal strains and heterogenity. So crystolecules cannot be made that way.) | + | (Sidenote: Thermodynamic synthesis of nanoscale gemstones gives almost no control of outer shape, internal strains and heterogenity. One usually gets an unstrained homogeneous crystal lattice with crystal faces in the directions of slowest growth. So crystolecules cannot be made that way. Unfortunately.) |
== Misc notes == | == Misc notes == | ||
Revision as of 18:05, 4 June 2018
The term gemstone superelasticity will be used on this wiki for the unusually high bendability/strainability of flawless nanoscale gemstone machine parts manufactured by advanced forms of mechanosynthesis. In short: The unusually high bendability of Crystolecules.
(Not to confuse with Pseudoelasticity [1] e.g. found in Nitinol.)
The basic building blocks for gemstone based nanomachinery are Crystolecules. They have an extremely low probability of containing at least one flaw like e.g. a misplaced atom. This is due to them being produced via advanced force applying mechanosynthesis. A digital process. Just like bit errors can be pushed to extreme rarity in digital data processing atom placing errors can too. (There are several ways to optimize for low error rate -- see dedicated page).
This flawlessness has the very desirable side effect that there are no unplanned spots where trapped non-relaxed pretension stresses reside and further stresses can concentrate and where cracks can start. Consequently gemstones can withstand very big strains (two digit percentage range) that are not possible with gemstones at the macroscopic scale. Such high strains are especially not possible with natural gemstones or todays (2018) thermodynamically produced synthetic gemstones.
Contents
Retaining high straibanility to the macroscale
Mechanosynthesized macroscopic slabs of gemstones (which may be quite a bit more difficult to make than crystolecules btw (wiki-TODO: elaborate)) may start out flawless but very quickly acquire flaws from all kinds of radiation (UV, gamma, ...) even when heavily shielded (neutrinos).
To retain extreme strainability as much as possible to the macroscale one can start to build things by interlocking crystolecules in smart ways (see: Shape locking). Cracks of broken crystloecules are instantly stopped and can't propagate any further.
Measuring Superelasticity
Very small crystals can have flawless structure even when produced thermodynamically today. This may provide a way to test superelasticity experimentally today. But this seems difficult. For compression maybe one could clamp a crystal with a super-hard monocrystalline nanoscale vice? But what would one do for tension? (TODO: check if there where experiments testing superelasticity)
(Sidenote: Thermodynamic synthesis of nanoscale gemstones gives almost no control of outer shape, internal strains and heterogenity. One usually gets an unstrained homogeneous crystal lattice with crystal faces in the directions of slowest growth. So crystolecules cannot be made that way. Unfortunately.)
Misc notes
(TODO: Investigate the effect of isotope mixtures on superelasticity.)
Related
- High pressure
- Crystolecules
- Gemstone based metamaterial ("gem-gum")
- Stiffness
- Superlubrication ... another performance parameter that can be unusually elevated at the nanoscale
