Pure metals and metallic alloys

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

Why these are to first approximation a bad choice for stiff cog&gear style nanomachinery nanomachinery and gemstone-like compounds are the way to go instead:

  • tendency to surface diffusion – some atoms do not stay where put at room temperature
  • tendency to oxidation – for all but a few noble metals which are generally too rare for large scale structural purposes
  • incompatibility with nanoscale passivation – making seamless covalent welding the default. (Related: Catenation)
  • ...

Stoichometric intermetallic compounds sometimes fair somewhat better:
Despite still being electrically conductive and optically reflective in the human visible spectral range,
their bonds have a bore covalent character.
This makes them less ductile and more brittle, which is ...

  • an undesirable property form macroscale parts with many high strain internal defects
  • a desirable property for nanoscale parts with on average no defects

Some gemstones that contain non-mentals too are also still metallic in optical and conductivity and optical properties (similar to inter-metallic compounds). Examples include:

  • pyrite FeS (iron sulfides)
  • hematite and magnetide (iron oxides)
  • titanium nitride and some other XY-type compounds where X=metal Y=nonmetal

Related




Complementary: