Difference between revisions of "Mechanosynthesis core"
m |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* next: [[DME assembly robotics]] | * next: [[DME assembly robotics]] | ||
| − | Akin to processor cores | + | Akin to processor cores defined by the local environments of arithmetic logic units the cores of APM systems can be considered to be the local environments of the places where [[mechanosynthesis]] is actually executed. |
| + | |||
| + | Different types of [[robotic manipulators]] can be used. | ||
== General purpouse cores == | == General purpouse cores == | ||
Revision as of 18:09, 10 February 2014
- preceeding: tooltip preparation zone
- next: DME assembly robotics
Akin to processor cores defined by the local environments of arithmetic logic units the cores of APM systems can be considered to be the local environments of the places where mechanosynthesis is actually executed.
Different types of robotic manipulators can be used.
General purpouse cores
General purpouse cores are robotic manipulators that either get tooltips delivered in a stream from or pick them up use them and put them down subsequently. With a few exceptions [todo explain them] they are very voluminous and slow compared to mill cores. They have the advantage that six degrees of freedom are easier to implement. Random access to different tool-types is not exclusive to general purpouse cores. I might be doable with mills just fine.
The zone where tool-tip preparation is done can clearly be separated. There the carriages holding the tools might be transported through channels on rails or on rolls like more like in a mills core.
Mill cores
- range of programmability
- delimitability to tooltip preparation zone
- consist out of a lot of strained shell structures
- [barrel mills; rails; use for unstrained infill]
