Chemospring
(wiki-TODO: Add 1D simplified block diagram illustration)
(wiki-TODO: Convert bullet points into better readable text)
Contents
The begin of a basic concrete design
Take the idea of seamless covalent welding, but make the interfaces sparse.
This way pulling the welded together crystolecules reliably breaks the bonds at the desired interface.
One gets a reversible (albeit weaker) interface instead of the typical irreversible interface when seamless covalent welding is done densely.
Pulling the interface only slightly apart one gets a very stiff short range spring action.
Take cylindrical crystolecule disks and put such sparse seamless covalent welding interfaces on both sides.
Putting multiple such disks in series (and possibly adding gear-down mechanisms too) can give intentionally weaker and longer range less stiff spring action
with same force times distance energy take-up capacity (aka spring toughness).
When the sparse covalent interfaces in series are stretched to very high bond strains then care must be taken.
Nonlinear force over distance leads to some weird behaviors if no engineering measures are taken against them.
See below in the section about nonlinear effects.
The basic abstract idea
A "spring" in a box that does not stretch bonds slightly but use them to their full extent, that is break them fully.
Normally bonds in mechanical springs get stretched/strained only a very tiny fraction
of the distance at which they exert the maximal restoring force.
The idea here is to to make functional metamaterial cells (possibly microcomponents but smaller or bigger works too)
with internal geometry such that for a lot of internal bonds their whole range of stretching can be used for spring action.
This extreme bending of many bonds blurs the line between
- bond breakage and formation in chemomechanical converters and
- conventional mechanical springs.
Just as in chemomechanical converters there is quite some overhead in structural framework material necessary to keep the actively hyper-stretched bonds in place.
High non-linearity and effects
When bonda are strained beyond their maximum of the restoring force a number of interesting things happen.
When a constant pulling force is applied then the bonds will stretch infinitely (aka fully rupture).
This will only stop if the design is such that other bonds kick in helping to prevent any further rip-apart.
Such a design is desirable.
When chemical bonds are naively put in series,
e.g. in the form of a stack of sparse seamless covalent welding interfaces,
then it comes to an instability. All the stretching will concentrate in just one interface of the interfaces that are put in series.
Which one that is is completely random. Determined by thermal motion and or quantum randomness.
- This is kinda similar to when one puts LEDs into parallel with only one common series resistor which is a bad idea.
It should be possible to devise mechanisms that make sure the stretching strain is equally divided over all the bonds in series.
The necessary control forces should be much smaller than the controlled forces.
- This is kinda similar to the enforcing a linear speed gradient in infinitesimal bearings.)
Bulletpoints
- Problem of "Low" energy absorption limit of crystolecule springs
- Maximizing metamaterial toughness
- dissipation into heat possible but wasteful (not a spring)
- Packaged in microcomponents?
- Reason for refrainment from using elastomers: Consistent design for external limiting factors
- Macroscale crash shock absorption: what normally goes into plastic deformation heat (picture crushed metal in a car crash test) goes into cool (reversible) bond breaking.
- More complex direction independent (anisotropic) design in Elasticity emulation.
- controllable lock and release
