Difference between revisions of "Chemospring"
From apm
(basically a bullet point list about what to write here (in what rough order)) |
(correction: bend => stretch) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{wikitodo|Convert bullet points into better readable text}} | {{wikitodo|Convert bullet points into better readable text}} | ||
| − | * A "spring" in a box that does not | + | * A "spring" in a box that does not stretch bonds slightly but use them to their full extent, that is break them fully. |
* Basically a direct application of [[chemomechanical converter]]s (same issue with structural passive material overhead) | * Basically a direct application of [[chemomechanical converter]]s (same issue with structural passive material overhead) | ||
* Problem of "Low" energy absorption limit of crystolecule springs | * Problem of "Low" energy absorption limit of crystolecule springs | ||
Revision as of 17:40, 17 May 2021
(wiki-TODO: Add 1D simplified block diagram illustration)
(wiki-TODO: Convert bullet points into better readable text)
- A "spring" in a box that does not stretch bonds slightly but use them to their full extent, that is break them fully.
- Basically a direct application of chemomechanical converters (same issue with structural passive material overhead)
- Problem of "Low" energy absorption limit of crystolecule springs
- Maximizing metamaterial toughness
- dissipation into heat possible but wasteful (not a spring)
- Packaged in microcomponents?
- Reason for refrainment from using elastomers: Consistent design for external limiting factors
- Macroscale crash shock absorption: what normally goes into plastic deformation heat (picture crushed metal in a car crash test) goes into cool (reversible) bond breaking.
- More complex direction independent (anisotropic) design in Elasticity emulation.
- controllable lock and release
