Difference between revisions of "Center for Bits and Atoms"
(added link to long 2h interview that I've fully watched recently) |
(Focus on growth plan (cellular automata)) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Just some notes for now … | Just some notes for now … | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Ready-fire-aim philosopy == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Discoveries and scientific progress by | ||
| + | * working on practical problems (where ideas come from (?)) | ||
| + | * failing but discovering something different | ||
| + | * which can be applied elsewhere eventually | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Focus on growth plan (cellular automata) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, I agree that the [[von Neumann bottleneck]] from <br> | ||
| + | separating storage and compute (arithmetic logic unit ALU) is very bad. | ||
| + | |||
| + | But personally I think maximally distributed compute (cellular automata) | ||
| + | is only useful in special application cases. E.g. far term [[utility fog]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't like the imperative nature of "what to do" step by step in a "growth plan". <br> | ||
| + | I prefer the denotative nature in a direct description. <br> | ||
| + | See: [[Decompression chain]] & [[Constructive solid geometry]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, a "growth plan" could be an automated step within a decompression chain. <br> | ||
| + | Actually extrusion in a [[nanofactory]] chip is kind of a growth plan. <br> | ||
| + | Just that the assembling nano and micro-machinery does not push itself along but rather stays put and pushes the product. <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is a bio-analogy to the (topologically 2D) "meristem" "germinal epithelia" "germinal zones" "germinal cells". <br> | ||
| + | See: [[Complex surface nonplanar nanofactory chip growthfronts]] <br> | ||
| + | Also see: [[Misleading biological analogies that should be avoided]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reminder: Full volume growth would lead to | ||
| + | * excessive productivity due to [[higher throughput of smaller machinery]]. | ||
| + | * complications in feed-stock supply needing to cross product volume | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
Revision as of 01:24, 9 June 2023
Just some notes for now …
Contents
Ready-fire-aim philosopy
Discoveries and scientific progress by
- working on practical problems (where ideas come from (?))
- failing but discovering something different
- which can be applied elsewhere eventually
Focus on growth plan (cellular automata)
Yes, I agree that the von Neumann bottleneck from
separating storage and compute (arithmetic logic unit ALU) is very bad.
But personally I think maximally distributed compute (cellular automata) is only useful in special application cases. E.g. far term utility fog.
I don't like the imperative nature of "what to do" step by step in a "growth plan".
I prefer the denotative nature in a direct description.
See: Decompression chain & Constructive solid geometry
Well, a "growth plan" could be an automated step within a decompression chain.
Actually extrusion in a nanofactory chip is kind of a growth plan.
Just that the assembling nano and micro-machinery does not push itself along but rather stays put and pushes the product.
There is a bio-analogy to the (topologically 2D) "meristem" "germinal epithelia" "germinal zones" "germinal cells".
See: Complex surface nonplanar nanofactory chip growthfronts
Also see: Misleading biological analogies that should be avoided
Reminder: Full volume growth would lead to
- excessive productivity due to higher throughput of smaller machinery.
- complications in feed-stock supply needing to cross product volume
Related
- The three axes of the Center for Bits and Atoms
- Simultaneous prototyping across scales
- Robot substructure gradients
External links
Websites:
- Landing page of Center for Bits and Atoms, CBA about page
- MIT: Center for Bits and Atoms
- Wikipedia: Center for Bits and Atoms
Videos:
- 2023-05-25 (~2hours): Neil Gershenfeld: Self-Replicating Robots and the Future of Fabrication | Lex Fridman Podcast #380
Papers & theses:
