Difference between revisions of "Hyper high throughput microcomponent recomposition"
From apm
(→Related: added * High performance of gem-gum technology) |
(added new section == Main restrictions == and link to macroscale slowness bottleneck) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* (2/2) the lower energy turnover and higher efficiency of [[microcomponent recomposition]] compared to [[piezochemical mechanosynthesis]] | * (2/2) the lower energy turnover and higher efficiency of [[microcomponent recomposition]] compared to [[piezochemical mechanosynthesis]] | ||
| − | The maximum of throughput-performance is likely expectable for microcomponent recomposition processes. | + | The maximum of throughput-performance is likely expectable for the smallest size scale where |
| + | * the energy turnover is not yet excessive | ||
| + | * bearing surface area is snot yet maximal | ||
| + | Ant this would be microcomponent recomposition processes. <br> | ||
This may lead to astounding and (if not handled properly) even dangerous levels of throughput. | This may lead to astounding and (if not handled properly) even dangerous levels of throughput. | ||
| − | + | == Main restrictions == | |
| − | For more details see the explanation on the page: [[Producer product pushapart]] | + | * The microcomponents that are to be assembled must already be available in a pre-produced state. |
| + | * If product removal cant be made faster than the assembly motions then one gets hard limited by the [[macroscale slowness bottleneck]] <br>For more details on this see the explanation on the page: [[Producer product pushapart]] | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
Revision as of 09:45, 9 July 2021
Microcomponent recomposers might be able to feature astounding to frightening levels of throughput capability.
Due to:
- (1/2) the scaling law of higher throughput of smaller machinery and ...
- (2/2) the lower energy turnover and higher efficiency of microcomponent recomposition compared to piezochemical mechanosynthesis
The maximum of throughput-performance is likely expectable for the smallest size scale where
- the energy turnover is not yet excessive
- bearing surface area is snot yet maximal
Ant this would be microcomponent recomposition processes.
This may lead to astounding and (if not handled properly) even dangerous levels of throughput.
Main restrictions
- The microcomponents that are to be assembled must already be available in a pre-produced state.
- If product removal cant be made faster than the assembly motions then one gets hard limited by the macroscale slowness bottleneck
For more details on this see the explanation on the page: Producer product pushapart
