Difference between revisions of "Mesocomponent"
(Basic version of the page) |
m (removed newline in intro) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{site specific term}} | {{site specific term}} | ||
| − | |||
In this wiki the term "mesocomponent" shall refer to structures that: | In this wiki the term "mesocomponent" shall refer to structures that: | ||
* have a size about 32µm or are made in assembly cells of about 32µm size | * have a size about 32µm or are made in assembly cells of about 32µm size | ||
Revision as of 16:13, 2 April 2021
In this wiki the term "mesocomponent" shall refer to structures that:
- have a size about 32µm or are made in assembly cells of about 32µm size
- are atomically precise
- are gemstone based
- are more or less indirectly preassembled
Contents
Origin and fate of mesocomponents
Mesocomponents could get assembled from
- either microcomponents
- or diretly from crystolecules (skipping one assembly level below - slow)
Mesocomponents could get assembled to
- either in place to the final product
- or to millimetre sized components (about 32 times bigger)
Why "meso"
The size range from mesocomponents to millimetre sized components (32µm to 1000µm=1mm) reaches
from just below what humans can perceive to just above what humans can perceive.
Thus the name mesoscale or "intermediate scale" for this size range.
Choice of size scale
It's in a nice chain of steps from nanoscale to macroscale.
32nm =x32=> 1000nm=1µm =x32=> 32µm =x32=> 1000µm=1mm
Recomposability and recycling
For mesocomponents it should be even easier than for microcomponents to make them reversibly recomposable. Eventually integrated reversibly shape locking interface structures (connection mechanisms) will use up even lower a fraction of the total volume. If they are kept small.
The design space for mesocomponents is yet again much bigger than the one for microcomponents.
It seems this makes the likelihood for reusability of whole mesocomponents lower than for microcomponents.
Recomposability of mesocomponents may thus be more of interest for quick product reconfigurations
where it would make sense to disassemble a product all the way down to it's microcomponents.
Like e.g. swapping front tires with back tires on a car just smaller.
Intuition about the size scale
Visibility
Many tree pollen have a similar size. These are not visible by human eye. Print layers on FDM printers can go down to a thickness of just 50µm. In harsh light these are visible by human eye. A gap of 32µm in a sliding caliper when held against the sun is easily visible.
Feelability
Scratching over a metal surface with a 32µm scratch in it is feelable.
