Difference between revisions of "Pathways to advanced APM systems"
From apm
(→Related: added * Pathway controversy) |
(added * The Mixed path) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[File:Rock_climber_on_the_Main_Wall_Trowbarrow.jpg|400px|thumb|right|the steep direct path]] | [[File:Rock_climber_on_the_Main_Wall_Trowbarrow.jpg|400px|thumb|right|the steep direct path]] | ||
[[File:Stone_path_on_Fan_Brycheiniog.jpg|400px|thumb|right|the long incremental path]] | [[File:Stone_path_on_Fan_Brycheiniog.jpg|400px|thumb|right|the long incremental path]] | ||
| − | * The [[ | + | * The [[Incremental path]] |
| − | * The [[ | + | * The [[Direct path]] |
| + | * The [[Mixed path]] | ||
* The historic [[Feynman path]] | * The historic [[Feynman path]] | ||
| + | * The paths that aren't paths: [[Brownian Path]] => [[Accidental Path]] | ||
[[Category:General]] | [[Category:General]] | ||
[[Category:Disquisition]] | [[Category:Disquisition]] | ||
| + | {{wikitodo|Needs a basic introduction.}} | ||
Its not a binary either or question whether the direct or the incremental path will be taken its more that the two represent extreme ends of a spectrum of possible development progressions. | Its not a binary either or question whether the direct or the incremental path will be taken its more that the two represent extreme ends of a spectrum of possible development progressions. | ||
Both types of paths will likely heavily borrow from the [[non mechanical technology path]]. | Both types of paths will likely heavily borrow from the [[non mechanical technology path]]. | ||
| − | There seems to be a | + | There seems to be a peaceful internal conflict. <br> |
See also: [[Pathway controversy]]. | See also: [[Pathway controversy]]. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 20: | ||
Critiques: | Critiques: | ||
| − | * incremental path (Ralph Merkle & co): slow and aimless little targeted effort ...<br> {{ | + | * incremental path (Ralph Merkle & co): slow and aimless little targeted effort ...<br> {{wikitodo|collect their arguments}} |
* direct path (E.Drexler & co): too hard to access experimentally, slow experimental progress, little research motivation (funds) | * direct path (E.Drexler & co): too hard to access experimentally, slow experimental progress, little research motivation (funds) | ||
| Line 25: | Line 28: | ||
It is worth to note that the usual association of the direct path with sudden and rapid changes and the indirect path with slow and progressive changes | It is worth to note that the usual association of the direct path with sudden and rapid changes and the indirect path with slow and progressive changes | ||
might be not incorrect. | might be not incorrect. | ||
| − | * {{ | + | * {{wikitodo|treat benefits and risks of fast vs slow changes}} |
== Related == | == Related == | ||
| Line 31: | Line 34: | ||
* [[Bootstrapping methods for productive nanosystems]] | * [[Bootstrapping methods for productive nanosystems]] | ||
* [[Pathway controversy]] | * [[Pathway controversy]] | ||
| + | * [[Bridging the gaps]] | ||
| + | * '''Up: [[Where to start targeted development]]''' | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | {{wikitodo|These following pages need some review.}} | ||
| + | * [[Non mechanical technology path]] | ||
| + | * [[Brownian technology path]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == External links == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Citation from the article "[http://crnano.typepad.com/crnblog/2006/09/from_here_to_na.html From Here to Nanofactories]" (crnano blog – Posted on September 24, 2006): <br> | ||
| + | "..., advances in one dimension will synergize with advances in other dimensions, so it may be more efficient to go straight to a new technology that makes bigger leaps forward in several dimensions at once. But if such a technology can't be found for a particular leap, it can be done in a series of incremental steps. ..." | ||
Latest revision as of 22:01, 1 August 2024
- The Incremental path
- The Direct path
- The Mixed path
- The historic Feynman path
- The paths that aren't paths: Brownian Path => Accidental Path
(wiki-TODO: Needs a basic introduction.)
Its not a binary either or question whether the direct or the incremental path will be taken its more that the two represent extreme ends of a spectrum of possible development progressions. Both types of paths will likely heavily borrow from the non mechanical technology path.
There seems to be a peaceful internal conflict.
See also: Pathway controversy.
Contents
Views of the paths from the proponents of different viewpoints
Critiques:
- incremental path (Ralph Merkle & co): slow and aimless little targeted effort ...
(wiki-TODO: collect their arguments) - direct path (E.Drexler & co): too hard to access experimentally, slow experimental progress, little research motivation (funds)
Relation to speed of introduction of advanced productive nanosystems
It seems any bets are off here. It is worth to note that the usual association of the direct path with sudden and rapid changes and the indirect path with slow and progressive changes might be not incorrect.
- (wiki-TODO: treat benefits and risks of fast vs slow changes)
Related
- Bootstrapping methods for productive nanosystems
- Pathway controversy
- Bridging the gaps
- Up: Where to start targeted development
(wiki-TODO: These following pages need some review.)
External links
Citation from the article "From Here to Nanofactories" (crnano blog – Posted on September 24, 2006):
"..., advances in one dimension will synergize with advances in other dimensions, so it may be more efficient to go straight to a new technology that makes bigger leaps forward in several dimensions at once. But if such a technology can't be found for a particular leap, it can be done in a series of incremental steps. ..."
