Difference between revisions of "There is limited room at the bottom"
(basic page) |
m (→Optimizing for throughput: improvements) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
| − | The name of this page was chosen as a complement to Richard Feynmans famous talk. | + | The name of this page was chosen as a complement to the title of Richard Feynmans famous talk. |
== Optimizing for throughput == | == Optimizing for throughput == | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* space (spacial periodicity of active cores / active sites) | * space (spacial periodicity of active cores / active sites) | ||
| − | === Limits === | + | === Limits along these two optimization pathways === |
The temporal density is limited by friction growing quadratically with speed. <br> | The temporal density is limited by friction growing quadratically with speed. <br> | ||
Thus going much beyond ~5mm/s equating to about ~1MHz for nanoscale wheels in [[mechanosynthesis]] is not really viable. <br> | Thus going much beyond ~5mm/s equating to about ~1MHz for nanoscale wheels in [[mechanosynthesis]] is not really viable. <br> | ||
| + | |||
Optimizing spacial density of reaction sites is a matter of geometric system design optimizations. <br> | Optimizing spacial density of reaction sites is a matter of geometric system design optimizations. <br> | ||
The limit here is how much functionality can be crammed in how little space. | The limit here is how much functionality can be crammed in how little space. | ||
| − | === Standard part mass production | + | === Spacial density optimization consequence: Standard part mass production in on-chip nanofactories. === |
These optimizations lead to on-chip [[nanofactories]] with [[semi hard-coded structures]] <br> | These optimizations lead to on-chip [[nanofactories]] with [[semi hard-coded structures]] <br> | ||
| Line 42: | Line 43: | ||
* [[Fat fingers]] | * [[Fat fingers]] | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | * '''[[Atom placement frequency]]''' | + | * '''[[Atom placement frequency]]''' (some math there) |
Latest revision as of 13:51, 2 July 2023
The name of this page was chosen as a complement to the title of Richard Feynmans famous talk.
Contents
Optimizing for throughput
Assembling matter almost atom by atom (ignoring hydrogen atoms) with
machinery featuring pretty much the same atomic granularity
poses some challenges to get all the needed machinery in a space as small as possible.
Two pathways to optimize – time and space
To reach a good high atom placement frequency
reactions must be performed densely in both …
- time (placement frequency frequency per active core / active site) and in
- space (spacial periodicity of active cores / active sites)
Limits along these two optimization pathways
The temporal density is limited by friction growing quadratically with speed.
Thus going much beyond ~5mm/s equating to about ~1MHz for nanoscale wheels in mechanosynthesis is not really viable.
Optimizing spacial density of reaction sites is a matter of geometric system design optimizations.
The limit here is how much functionality can be crammed in how little space.
Spacial density optimization consequence: Standard part mass production in on-chip nanofactories.
These optimizations lead to on-chip nanofactories with semi hard-coded structures
in their bottom-most assembly level as dedicated one task machines can be build much more compact than fully general purpose ones.
See: Bottom scale assembly lines in gem-gum factories.
These optimizations lead away from Molecular assemblers as advanced productive nanosystem (outdated).
As these would need to cram full selfreplicativity capability in a very small volume,
which is asking for fully general purpose mechanism for piezomecanosynthesis.
And those are necessarily much slower than specialized assembly lines.
Related
- There is plenty of room at the bottom
- Richard Feynman
- Bottom scale assembly lines in gem-gum factories
- Mechanosynthesis core
- Fat fingers
- Atom placement frequency (some math there)
