Difference between revisions of "Experimental demonstrations of single atom manipulation"
m (→Mechanical force involved – covalent solids – only "slightly" cold) |
(Added amazing news about first early experimental work on diamondoid tooltips - specifically the HAT) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Since progress here seems painstakingly slow (state 2017), a great hope is that the [[incremental path]] | Since progress here seems painstakingly slow (state 2017), a great hope is that the [[incremental path]] | ||
can much faster build up systems in which once they reach sufficient sophistication the results of the single atom manipulation attempts (discussed here) can be integrated. | can much faster build up systems in which once they reach sufficient sophistication the results of the single atom manipulation attempts (discussed here) can be integrated. | ||
+ | |||
+ | = Diamondoid AP tooltips = | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Single atom manipulation experiments with atomically precise nanoscale tooltips:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | There supposedly where somewhen (2021) done some experiments on an atomically precise nanoscale hydrogen abstraction tooltip (HAT): | ||
+ | ( http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/Habs/paper.html ) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Specifically one of the tips supposedly tried was | ||
+ | * an ethyne radical | ||
+ | * on the tip of an adamantane cage | ||
+ | * linked via three -S-CH2- bridges to a gold surface. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Video (timestamp 35:44): [https://youtu.be/VhG0_KkXWwk?list=PLH78wfbGI1x3hjH8RKrgoT6pgUG-k0vdI&t=2144] | ||
+ | * One diamondoid tool was created and verified | ||
+ | * abstraction of an atom (presumably hydrogen) from an SPM tip may have been demonstrated (?) – UV cleared | ||
+ | * development of two more tools was planned supposedly | ||
+ | * project end was 2021-12 supposedly | ||
+ | * eventually science or nature paper on this … | ||
+ | * Also mentioned: Expected benefit 100x to 1000x speedup from MEMS AFM/STM (UT Dallas) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Video (timestamp 13:57): [https://youtu.be/VhG0_KkXWwk?list=PLH78wfbGI1x3hjH8RKrgoT6pgUG-k0vdI&t=844] | ||
+ | * Location: UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) | ||
+ | * Funding: seems switched to CBN (Canadian Banknote Company) – Now core of Canadas APM program? | ||
+ | * Info from vendors: Several dozens of scienta omicron low temp STM machines (developed by UCLA) where orderedby "them". | ||
+ | * Lowest TRL ([[technology readiness level]]) effort in the "group" ( DOE=>AMO? – https://www.energy.gov/eere/amo/ ) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Corresponding slides 21 and 12 here: [https://foresight.org/salon/amos-program-in-atomically-precise-manufacturing-and-nanocarbon-metals-tina-kaarsberg-doe/#] | ||
= Real science - Lying images = | = Real science - Lying images = |
Revision as of 10:28, 2 July 2022
There already have been several demonstrations that placing matter atom by atom is indeed possible even with our still very crude big and clunky current technology.
- At first this was limited to extremely low temperatures (liquid helium) metallic surfaces and scanning tunneling microscopes.
- Later it was shown that (as expectable) on covalent surfaces things stay put at much higher (but still cold) temperatures (liquid nitrogen)
- A bit of scaling up was shown too but this was all done on the easier purely metallic systems.
Pushing single atom manipulation capabilities forward can generally considered part of the direct path. Since progress here seems painstakingly slow (state 2017), a great hope is that the incremental path can much faster build up systems in which once they reach sufficient sophistication the results of the single atom manipulation attempts (discussed here) can be integrated.
Contents
Diamondoid AP tooltips
Single atom manipulation experiments with atomically precise nanoscale tooltips:
There supposedly where somewhen (2021) done some experiments on an atomically precise nanoscale hydrogen abstraction tooltip (HAT): ( http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/Habs/paper.html )
Specifically one of the tips supposedly tried was
- an ethyne radical
- on the tip of an adamantane cage
- linked via three -S-CH2- bridges to a gold surface.
Video (timestamp 35:44): [1]
- One diamondoid tool was created and verified
- abstraction of an atom (presumably hydrogen) from an SPM tip may have been demonstrated (?) – UV cleared
- development of two more tools was planned supposedly
- project end was 2021-12 supposedly
- eventually science or nature paper on this …
- Also mentioned: Expected benefit 100x to 1000x speedup from MEMS AFM/STM (UT Dallas)
Video (timestamp 13:57): [2]
- Location: UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles)
- Funding: seems switched to CBN (Canadian Banknote Company) – Now core of Canadas APM program?
- Info from vendors: Several dozens of scienta omicron low temp STM machines (developed by UCLA) where orderedby "them".
- Lowest TRL (technology readiness level) effort in the "group" ( DOE=>AMO? – https://www.energy.gov/eere/amo/ )
Corresponding slides 21 and 12 here: [3]
Real science - Lying images
Note: Images are often halfway pure reality halfway pure fantasy.
One intuitively tends to interpret brightness as topographic hight but in STM (scanning tunneling microscopy) images brightness actually only gives information about electron density (more concretely: local electron density of states at the probed bias voltage level). This misinterpretation is often taken one step further and the pseudo-height is rendered as real 3D surface with the peaks throwing shadows. (Probably mainly because it looks pretty).
Also since one is pushing the limits SPM (STM and AFM) images are usually very noisy. Since atomic lattices show high regularity/periodicity one researchers can be tempted to remove high frequency part of the images to make images prettier but this also removes information that might have been more than just random noise. (Method: Fourier transformation (FT) this gives an "image spectrum image" -> cutting of outer high frequency border leaving in important peaks -> backward FT)
pure metals - easiest in lab - least useful in advanced APM
The early research illustrates nicely why pure metals are not too suitable for advanced APM.
- Extreme cooling is needed to keep lone surface adsorbed atoms from wildly hopping around (diffusion).
- The free electron gas of metals (especially a 2D sheet on the surface) may complicate mechanosynthesis (just makes EE harder.)
Notes
(TODO: Add illustrative image to article)
Related
- Scanning probe microscopy
- Mechanosynthesis
- Why gemstone metamaterial technology should work in brief
External links
No mechanical force only tunneling current – metallic solids & noble gas atoms – ultra-cold
- IBM: IBM_(atoms) (Xe on Ni – early famous work)
- IBM: A Boy And His Atom: The World's Smallest Movie – Wikipedia: A_Boy_and_His_Atom (carbon monoxide CO on Cu – 5K)
- A kilobyte rewritable atomic memory video (chlorine Cl on copper Cu)
- NIST: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NIST_HipHopAtomLogo.jpg (Co on Cu)
- NIST: quantum corral (Co on Cu 7K & 4.3K)
- Quantum corral: Crommie M. F., Lutz C. P., Eigler D.M. Confinement of electrons to quantum corrals on a metal surface // Science. 1993. V. 262. P. 218–220. – (Fe on Cu) picture of 3D printed model
Mechanical force involved – covalent solids – only "slightly" cold
Swapping tin and silicon atoms:
Yoshiaki Sugimoto 1, Pablo Pou 2, Oscar Custance 3, Pavel Jelinek 4, Masayuki Abe 1, Rubén Pérez 2 & Seizo Morita 1.
Complex patterning by vertical interchange atom manipulation using atomic force microscopy
Science 322 , 413-417 (2008).
(DOI link)
(pdf)
Ripping out and redepositing sigle silicon atoms on silicon surface:
Noriaki Oyabu, Oscar Custance, Insook Yi, Yasuhiro Sugawara, Seizo Morita, "Mechanical vertical manipulation of selected single atoms by soft nanoindentation using near contact Atomic Force Microscopy," Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(2 May 2003):176102; http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v90/e176102
pdf on academia.edu (78K)
Press release on osaka university page.
– (pdf)