Difference between revisions of "In-solvent piezochemical mechanosynthesis"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
m (External links)
m (Apm moved page In solution piezochemical mechanosynthesis to In-solvent piezochemical mechanosynthesis: changed to match the topics main page)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
because this is likely an easier task. Walking before running. <br>
 
because this is likely an easier task. Walking before running. <br>
  
An intermediate step between step between  
+
This page shall focus more on the core process. <br>
* structures artificially created via [[thermally driven selfassembly]]
+
More generally see: [[Technology level II]] aka [[In-solvent gem-gum technology]]. <br>
* full on [[piezochemical mechanosynthesis]] in [[PPV]]
+
'''An intermediate step between step between:'''
 +
* structures artificially created via [[thermally driven self assembly]] and rudimentary robotic control – [[technology level I]]
 +
* full on [[piezochemical mechanosynthesis]] in [[PPV]] – [[technology level III]] aka [[gem-gum technology]]
  
 
== Relation to R&D in bio-mineralization ==
 
== Relation to R&D in bio-mineralization ==

Latest revision as of 16:19, 9 October 2021

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

The here is to perform atomically precise
piezochemical mechanosynthesis in solution before going to a full on PPV vacuum,
because this is likely an easier task. Walking before running.

This page shall focus more on the core process.
More generally see: Technology level II aka In-solvent gem-gum technology.
An intermediate step between step between:

Relation to R&D in bio-mineralization

Current mainstream bio-mineralization research may not be very
aligned with a focused aim at advancement of APM towards gemstone metamaterial technology.

This is out of two reasons:

  • A lack of a focus on atomic precision.
  • A focus on soon reachable better material properties rather than fundamentals for only later reachable advanced material properties. More concretely:
    – a focus on materialtype-heterogeneous metamaterials without atomic precision rather than
    – a focus on materialtype-homogeneous metamaterials with atomic precision.

One major focus of bio-mineralization R&D is the
recreation of composite materials with good mechanical properties like e.g. nacre
without a focus on atomically precise material synthesis one moiety at a time.

Lack of a focus on atomic precision

In bio-mineralization proteins may release salt-ions in close vicinity of
the deposition target. Thereby creating a local supersaturation and a falling out of the salt ions
onto the bio-mineral traget-structure. But all that without full atomic precision.
(TODO: To investigate in how far this is really the case, and in how far it is even known how much or less of atomic precision is involved in natural bio-mineralization.)

A focus on different types of metamaterials

In nacre good mechanical properties are created through the interleaving of solid unstructured bio-minerals with protein-layers.
But in gemstone metamaterial technology good mechanical properties shall be engineered by nano-structuring (bio)minerals with atomic precision.

One can think of it as:

  • gem-gum-tec targeting textiles made out nanoscale gemstone chainmaille.
  • Mainstream biomineralization R&D aiming at laminated composite materials
    as e.g. nacre: slabs of horn-like proteins interspersed with slabs of single crystalline calc-spar

These are quite different goals.

Relevant overlap

(TODO: Investigate in how far parts of existing bio-mineralization R&D have overlap with work aiming at gem-gum-tec.)

Misc

Due to the solvent there is a lot of viscous drag still preventing high throughput in this stage of development.

Conditions can be quite near to the assembled structure dissolving again. This:

  • May help in assembly
  • may put atomically precise synthesis in competition with other non atomically precise in solution nano-manufacturing techniques
  • May quickly destroy the the atomic precision again due to too high dissolution and re-deposition at temperatures the solvent is not frozen

Related

External links

Interesting vaguely related topic:
Solubility of calcium carbonate is pressure dependent: