Difference between revisions of "Atom placement frequency"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(added * Pages with math and same category)
(replaced nonofactory therm)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{stub}}
 
{{stub}}
For [[nanofactories]] to be able to put human scale objects together atom by atom in reasonable timespans they need to place atoms at mind boggling rates.
+
For [[gemstone metamaterial on-chip factories]] to be able to put human scale objects together atom by atom in reasonable timespans they need to place atoms at mind boggling rates.
  
 
== Example ==
 
== Example ==

Revision as of 16:44, 10 June 2021

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

For gemstone metamaterial on-chip factories to be able to put human scale objects together atom by atom in reasonable timespans they need to place atoms at mind boggling rates.

Example

Assuming f0 = 1MHz atom placement frequency per mechanosynthesis core how many cores (Ncore) does one need to reach the desired throughput of Q0 = 1kg/h ?
Ncore = Q0 / (mC * f0) = ~1.4*1015 cores (about an 1.4 Petacore system). (mC … mass of carbon atom.)
A core size of ~(32nm)3 = ~32000(nm3) seems to be a sensible guess for advanced APM systems.
All the cores together then take a volume of size ~45(mm3) = ~ 45microliters.
This can be spread out plenty to remove high levels of waste heat.
The effective atom placement frequency in this system is f0*Ncore = 1.4*1021 atoms per second (1.4ZHz – quite mind boggling) (>> 109 Atoms/second).

Early mechanosynthetic systems will be several orders of magnitude lower in throughput though.

  • They will have low temporal placement frequency
  • they may be only two dimensional
  • but they'll be already massively parallel

Related