Difference between revisions of "Well merging"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(The basic process to avoid well merging: process for reversible mechanosynthesis follows the same principle)
(Coverage in the Nanosystems book)
 
Line 68: Line 68:
 
cryptography based on asymmetric problem difficulty would be kind of broken. <br>
 
cryptography based on asymmetric problem difficulty would be kind of broken. <br>
 
See: [[Reversible logic]]
 
See: [[Reversible logic]]
 +
 +
== Coverage in the [[Nanosystems]] book ==
 +
 +
Page 186 Chapter 7.6. Transitions among time-dependent wells. <br>
 +
Figure 7.9. Merging of … wells <br>
 +
 +
{{wikitodo|Summarize Nanosystems findings here too.}}
  
 
== Limits to losslessness ==
 
== Limits to losslessness ==

Latest revision as of 19:55, 27 November 2023

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.
Red arrows are lossy/dissipative/irreversible well merging processes. Follow the spiral of green arrows to go from a 0 to a 1 (or vice versa) in a lossless/nondissipative/reversible/adiabatic manner.
By smartly crafting the temporal trajectory of the potential wells for tool-tip and work-piece-surface mechanosynthesis can be made vastly more efficient than "normal chemistry".

This page is about …

  • … energetic losses being incurred when potential energy wells of a bi-stable system are merged.
  • … changing the state of a system without needing to expend energy (in the limit of slow speeds).

Contexts

Logic / computation

Changing bits from 0 to 1 or vice versa losslessly in reversible logic
possibly nanomechanical computation like e.g. rod logic.

Building & Energy

Depositong an atom from a tooltip to a workpiece losslessly.
Breaking and forming chemical bonds losslessly in a chemomechanical converter system.

The basic process to avoid well merging

Green arrows in graphic.

(1) While the barrier is still up
– Bring the occupied state in an energetic favorable
– Bring the unoccupied state in an energetic infavorable state

(2) Remove the barrier
– either bringing the wells closer together if a space of vacuum is the barrier (mechanosynthesis)
– or removing/retract a physical part responsible for the barrier (reversible logic)
This process may recuperate energy back into storage.
With absence of a barrier now an intermediate state is occupied.

(3) While the barrier is still down
– Bring the eventually to be occupied state in an energetic favorable
– Bring the eventually to be unoccupied state in an energetic infavorable state

(4) Raise the barrier
By doing step (2) in reverse.
Now the occupied state switched the well.


The barrier needs to be >>kT to prevent thermally caused flips.
Note that at no point there was this >>kT energy dissipated.
This would have happened if the barrier would have been removed
during a phase where the occupied state is in an well that is energetically unfavorable (or even equally favorable).


'Note that the process for reversible mechanosynthesis follows the very same principle. Just that …
– The green arrows are mapped to "reversible time".
– The barrier is removed by moving one well closer keeping the other one stationary. Matter of perspective.
– The favorability/unfavorability of wells could be influenced by angle of approach or offset of approach.

Well merging

The red arrows in the graphic shows these adiabatic process violations.
All these lead to irreversible energy dissipation.
This energy dissipative process is called "well merging".

In computation some times it is much more practically to strategically delete a few bits
by well merging rather than trying to keep absolutely everything reversible.
Fascinatingly if fully reversible logic would be exactly as powerful as irreversible logic then
cryptography based on asymmetric problem difficulty would be kind of broken.
See: Reversible logic

Coverage in the Nanosystems book

Page 186 Chapter 7.6. Transitions among time-dependent wells.
Figure 7.9. Merging of … wells

(wiki-TODO: Summarize Nanosystems findings here too.)

Limits to losslessness

Of course this is all merely near losslessly.
As there are are other dissipation mechanisms like dynamic friction
and dissipation pertaining to reciprocative motions.
Plus there is an absolute minimum amount to dissipate to define a local arrow of time for the nanomachinery.
Preventing it from running backwards occasionally.

Remaining dissipation in the adiabatic case

Regarding the absolute minimum energy needed for a system to operate forward at finite nonzero speeds:
This is a matter of dissipating enough energy per time to gain a sufficiently defined arrow of time.
In the context of chemomechanical converters, mechanochemistry and mechanosynthesis
a way to get down to the absolute minimum mandatory amount of energy dissipation may be
there process defined on the page dissipation sharing.

Related