Difference between revisions of "Tin"
(basic page) |
(relativated a bit - metastable configurations can have slightly better thermal stability - know this from working with crystallized PET plastic) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Since α-tin has strong covalent character it is a good target for direct mechanosynthesis. | Since α-tin has strong covalent character it is a good target for direct mechanosynthesis. | ||
[[mechanosynthesis|Mechanosynthesized]] α-tin would not be a fine powder but likely a stronger material akin to germanium. | [[mechanosynthesis|Mechanosynthesized]] α-tin would not be a fine powder but likely a stronger material akin to germanium. | ||
| − | The production path through mechanosynthesis would not change | + | The production path through mechanosynthesis would probably not change much on its low thermal stability though. |
Note that long before the material melts unwanted diffusion kicks in that destroys carefully arranged atomically precise structures. | Note that long before the material melts unwanted diffusion kicks in that destroys carefully arranged atomically precise structures. | ||
Revision as of 18:27, 23 July 2018
Tins identity crisis
Tin is quite far on the right in the periodic table sharing its group with the non metal carbon and the semi metals silicon and geranium.
Nonetheless tin in the form commonly encountered is metallic (it's tetragonal β-Tin). But it has a second (usually unwanted) crystal form (face centered cubic α-tin - the diamond lattice). In fact this second crystal structure is more characteristic for its group.
Under low temperature conditions (below 11°C) and especially under the presence of a bit of catalyzing α-tin β-tin can start to convert to α-tin destroying the materials structural integrity due to a large change in unit cell geometry.
Since α-tin has strong covalent character it is a good target for direct mechanosynthesis. Mechanosynthesized α-tin would not be a fine powder but likely a stronger material akin to germanium. The production path through mechanosynthesis would probably not change much on its low thermal stability though. Note that long before the material melts unwanted diffusion kicks in that destroys carefully arranged atomically precise structures.
Stabilizing the more diamondoid and exotic α-Tin
To increase thermal stability some of the tin atoms in the lattice could be replaced by elements that are located above tin in the periodic table in a systematic checkerboard pattern. With that one also reduce
Germanium is to rare for large scale construction materials. (SnGe) Carbon is not abundant but highly accessible but it might have a little low atomic radius. (SnC) Silicon is abundant and has a bigger radius and is thus likely a good candidate (SnSi).
Thermodynamically produced alloys of tin and silicon (melting and mixing) do not form an intermetallic highly ordered stochiometric phase and have thus likely very different (inferior) properties than mechanosynthesized checkerboard SnSi.
Mechanosynthesis may even allow to coax the element below tin which is lead into a diamond lattice with covalent character by combining it with carbon. This compound (PbC) is to current knowledge (2017) not thermodynamically accessible but when mechanosynthesized it may be stable enough to not blow up in your face on the slightest disturbance.
External Links
- Thermodynamic phase diagram of Sn & Si: [1]
- Wikipedia: Tin pest
- Wikipedia: Hypothetical compound lead carbide
