Difference between revisions of "Foldamer R&D"
From apm
(→External links: added link to a presentation of Christian Schafmeister + some discussion of that) |
m (→External links: no mention of gemstone as far term goal) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* The waste problem with POPs (persistent organic pollutants) -- See: [[Recycling]] | * The waste problem with POPs (persistent organic pollutants) -- See: [[Recycling]] | ||
* The lignin pileup in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carboniferous Carboniferous] epoch of earths history. | * The lignin pileup in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carboniferous Carboniferous] epoch of earths history. | ||
| + | * The talk doesn't look beyond towards gemstone based systems as far term goal. Partially [[brownian technology path]]? | ||
Revision as of 19:52, 14 August 2017
- structural DNA nanotechnology
- de-novo protein engineering
- peptidomimetics like peptoids (& beta-peptides)
- spiroligomers
Related
- Incremental path
- Reached milestones in foldamer R&D
- Self folding
- covalent cross interlinking (increasing stiffness)
- POPs (persistant organic pollutants) -- See: "Soil pollutants"
- Microfluidics
External links
- Wikipedia: Foldamer
- Wikipedia: De_novo_protein_structure_prediction
- Wikipedia: PeptidomimeticPeptoidBeta-peptide
Video:
"Clasp: Common Lisp using LLVM and C++ for Molecular Metaprogramming" [1]
Published on Jun 15, 2015 – Google Tech Talk – June 9, 2015 – Presented by Christian Schafmeister.
This video also brings up topics like:
- The importance of stiffness – double linked backbones prevent rotations making resulting structures much easier to desing and more predictable
- Iterative design of early forms of Kaehler brackets
optimization of a stiff backbone to get functional groups as close as possible to a fixed predefined configuration (that may have been stolen from a natural protein) - General software issues – programming language limitations, the dreaded interface problem,
"deforresting" unnecessary computer algebra reevaluations (a problem also showing up in volumetric 3D modelling aka distance field based 3D modelling; Design levels),
the need for derivation towers (scalar,vector,tensor) (automatic derivation - links to Conal Elliotts work) - The waste problem with POPs (persistent organic pollutants) -- See: Recycling
- The lignin pileup in the Carboniferous epoch of earths history.
- The talk doesn't look beyond towards gemstone based systems as far term goal. Partially brownian technology path?
