Difference between revisions of "Bridging the gaps"
(added wikitodo for a sketch) |
(added section == Gap in time ==) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
For the successful development of a [[gem-gum factory]] several gaps need to be bridged. | For the successful development of a [[gem-gum factory]] several gaps need to be bridged. | ||
| − | * top-down to bottom up gap | + | * the gap in scale: top-down to bottom up gap |
| − | * present-forward to future-backward gap | + | * the gap in time: present-forward to future-backward gap |
----- | ----- | ||
* gaps between established fields of science (disciplines, interdisciplinary) ... (conceptual,institutional) | * gaps between established fields of science (disciplines, interdisciplinary) ... (conceptual,institutional) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{wikitodo|Add illustration with four hands before and after linking up, cracks as gaps and tech sketches.}} | {{wikitodo|Add illustration with four hands before and after linking up, cracks as gaps and tech sketches.}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == The gap in time == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is actually a gap in the [[timeless landscape of technology]] mapped onto time (and space). | ||
| + | A gap from and to technologies that the laws of physics fundamentally allow, | ||
| + | just that some technologies already implemented while others aren't (yet). | ||
| + | |||
| + | Its very easy to miss this subtle but important difference. | ||
| + | This difference is the reason why we, when we ask the right [[exploratory engineering]] questions, | ||
| + | can get some very reliable (but admittedly narrow) glimpses of aspects of future technology. | ||
| + | Why [[main page|this whole wiki]] makes sense in the first place. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === present forward === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Development heavy R&D. <br> | ||
| + | Basically the early steps in the [[incremental path]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === future backward === | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is about preparatory design that creates: | ||
| + | * (1) desirable development targets | ||
| + | * (2) a bit of a [[theoretical overhang]] | ||
| + | Examples: | ||
| + | * preliminary experimentally testing advanced mechanosynthetic reactions with the limited means available (slow crude SPM tips) | ||
| + | * preliminary theoretic investigation of mechanosynthetic processes (closed tooltip cycles, ...) | ||
| + | * preliminary design of different types of [[crystolecule]] to establish and grow a convex hull of points in design space. A convex hull spanning an "volume" in design space of what should be (with high reliability) possible. | ||
| + | |||
| + | These efforts overlap with the [[direct path]] approach, <br> | ||
| + | with the difference that there is a strong focus on trying to tie the results together with the most advanced results of the [[incremental path]]. <br> | ||
| + | e.g. mouing advanced tool-tips onto self assembled protein nano-robotics. | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
| Line 17: | Line 47: | ||
* [[Technological percolation limit]] | * [[Technological percolation limit]] | ||
* [[Theoretical overhang]] | * [[Theoretical overhang]] | ||
| + | * [[Exploratory engineering]] | ||
Revision as of 13:59, 26 August 2018
For the successful development of a gem-gum factory several gaps need to be bridged.
- the gap in scale: top-down to bottom up gap
- the gap in time: present-forward to future-backward gap
- gaps between established fields of science (disciplines, interdisciplinary) ... (conceptual,institutional)
- gap between APM expert knowledge and public perception
- gaps between the various parties involved in the history conflict about APM
(wiki-TODO: Add illustration with four hands before and after linking up, cracks as gaps and tech sketches.)
The gap in time
This is actually a gap in the timeless landscape of technology mapped onto time (and space). A gap from and to technologies that the laws of physics fundamentally allow, just that some technologies already implemented while others aren't (yet).
Its very easy to miss this subtle but important difference. This difference is the reason why we, when we ask the right exploratory engineering questions, can get some very reliable (but admittedly narrow) glimpses of aspects of future technology. Why this whole wiki makes sense in the first place.
present forward
Development heavy R&D.
Basically the early steps in the incremental path.
future backward
This is about preparatory design that creates:
- (1) desirable development targets
- (2) a bit of a theoretical overhang
Examples:
- preliminary experimentally testing advanced mechanosynthetic reactions with the limited means available (slow crude SPM tips)
- preliminary theoretic investigation of mechanosynthetic processes (closed tooltip cycles, ...)
- preliminary design of different types of crystolecule to establish and grow a convex hull of points in design space. A convex hull spanning an "volume" in design space of what should be (with high reliability) possible.
These efforts overlap with the direct path approach,
with the difference that there is a strong focus on trying to tie the results together with the most advanced results of the incremental path.
e.g. mouing advanced tool-tips onto self assembled protein nano-robotics.
