Difference between revisions of "Acetylene sorting pump"
(basic page) |
(big extension) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | [[File:atomistic acetylene sorting pump model.jpg|frame|A proposed [[acetylene sorting pump]].]] | ||
An acetylene sorting pump (or ethyne sorting pump) is a proposed form of "[[Sorting rotors]]" | An acetylene sorting pump (or ethyne sorting pump) is a proposed form of "[[Sorting rotors]]" | ||
to filter the potential [[resource molecule]] ethyne (aka [[acetylene]]) to ultra high purity for further processing. | to filter the potential [[resource molecule]] ethyne (aka [[acetylene]]) to ultra high purity for further processing. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
{{wikitodo|Check if the the original molecular data for this model can still be attained. Thre seems to be only one low resolution screen-capture left on the web.}} | {{wikitodo|Check if the the original molecular data for this model can still be attained. Thre seems to be only one low resolution screen-capture left on the web.}} | ||
| − | == | + | == Some discussion of design aspects == |
| + | The acetylene sorting pump is a larger diamondoid machine element (DMEs). The frame is one big monolithic crystolecule (it may be fused togehter via [[seamless covalent welding]] during assembly). Other parts are smaller independent crystolecules that may be mechanosynthesized fully passivated as a whole and integrated as a whole without any seamless welding. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Critical aspects of the [[semi diamondoid]] parts of the design === | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[ethyne]] molecules need to want to go into (and through) the narrow supply channels. | ||
| + | In other words a lower energy state is desired within the supply channels. '''Has this been analyzed or simulated?''' | ||
| + | Nanoscale channels can sometimes cause some odd effects like high temperature freezing. | ||
| + | If ist works. '''How efficient can this be made?''' How low of an energy drop is sufficient for molecules being transported efficiently? | ||
| + | |||
| + | What about binding energy the specificity of the binding pocket (CO2 is somewhat similar in shape and size) – there probably where investigations | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Possible critique points (for this specific proposed design):''' <br> | ||
Due to the integrated [[ethyne rods]]: | Due to the integrated [[ethyne rods]]: | ||
* possibly higher [[radiation damage]] sensitivity. | * possibly higher [[radiation damage]] sensitivity. | ||
* parts possibly quite a bit more difficult to synthesize | * parts possibly quite a bit more difficult to synthesize | ||
| − | == Possible alternatives == | + | === Interesting aspects of the diamondoid parts of the design (less critical) === |
| + | |||
| + | * The drive rods featuring a helical design and running in cyclindrical guides that give only radial support. | ||
| + | * The [[worm drive]]. This was the first time such a [[diamondoid molecular machine element]] was modelled (to the authors knowledge). | ||
| + | * [[Sparce strained shell to frame transition]] | ||
| + | * How much may [[ethyne rods]] flex before them becoming too reactive and potentially sometimes covalently bonding to a guide-wall? | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{wikitodo|Find out if there was some reasoning behind gearing down an how much.}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Possible alternatives (for this specific proposed design) == | ||
'''Are there alternative solutions?''' <br> | '''Are there alternative solutions?''' <br> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 48: | ||
(1) Big thermal differences should equate to big (macroscopic) spacial distances stretching out the design massively. Big distances allow for good thermal insulation and thermal energy recuperation. | (1) Big thermal differences should equate to big (macroscopic) spacial distances stretching out the design massively. Big distances allow for good thermal insulation and thermal energy recuperation. | ||
(2) There are several purification stages to go through. So this long distance needs to be bone through several times back and forth. | (2) There are several purification stages to go through. So this long distance needs to be bone through several times back and forth. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
Revision as of 12:42, 7 June 2021
An acetylene sorting pump (or ethyne sorting pump) is a proposed form of "Sorting rotors" to filter the potential resource molecule ethyne (aka acetylene) to ultra high purity for further processing.
Since sorting rotors or (something equivalent in function) are a core critical component of the proposed far term target of gem-gum factories, these where investigated in a bit more detail than other system parts.
Specifically an atomistic model of an acetylene sorting pump with the software Nanoengineer-1 was created. This was the biggest and most complex modeled molecular machine element designed so far (at time of writing 2021). It contains several structural crytolecules that are combined in a way that allows complex relative motions in a superlubricating way (no snapback).
(wiki-TODO: Check if the the original molecular data for this model can still be attained. Thre seems to be only one low resolution screen-capture left on the web.)
Contents
Some discussion of design aspects
The acetylene sorting pump is a larger diamondoid machine element (DMEs). The frame is one big monolithic crystolecule (it may be fused togehter via seamless covalent welding during assembly). Other parts are smaller independent crystolecules that may be mechanosynthesized fully passivated as a whole and integrated as a whole without any seamless welding.
Critical aspects of the semi diamondoid parts of the design
The ethyne molecules need to want to go into (and through) the narrow supply channels. In other words a lower energy state is desired within the supply channels. Has this been analyzed or simulated? Nanoscale channels can sometimes cause some odd effects like high temperature freezing. If ist works. How efficient can this be made? How low of an energy drop is sufficient for molecules being transported efficiently?
What about binding energy the specificity of the binding pocket (CO2 is somewhat similar in shape and size) – there probably where investigations
Possible critique points (for this specific proposed design):
Due to the integrated ethyne rods:
- possibly higher radiation damage sensitivity.
- parts possibly quite a bit more difficult to synthesize
Interesting aspects of the diamondoid parts of the design (less critical)
- The drive rods featuring a helical design and running in cyclindrical guides that give only radial support.
- The worm drive. This was the first time such a diamondoid molecular machine element was modelled (to the authors knowledge).
- Sparce strained shell to frame transition
- How much may ethyne rods flex before them becoming too reactive and potentially sometimes covalently bonding to a guide-wall?
(wiki-TODO: Find out if there was some reasoning behind gearing down an how much.)
Possible alternatives (for this specific proposed design)
Are there alternative solutions?
Without the rods pushing the molecules out of the pockets actively
it may be doable via thermal means. The issue here though is that:
(1) Big thermal differences should equate to big (macroscopic) spacial distances stretching out the design massively. Big distances allow for good thermal insulation and thermal energy recuperation.
(2) There are several purification stages to go through. So this long distance needs to be bone through several times back and forth.
