Difference between revisions of "A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis (paper)"
From apm
m (→Related) |
(added link to * Quantumchemistry simulation) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
This is all very far from an experimentally demonstrated tooltip cycle yet though. <br> | This is all very far from an experimentally demonstrated tooltip cycle yet though. <br> | ||
(Note: throughput rate and fundamental mechanosynthetic capability can probably be developed separately and orthogonally from each other for the most part) | (Note: throughput rate and fundamental mechanosynthetic capability can probably be developed separately and orthogonally from each other for the most part) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Quantumchemistry simulation]] | ||
== External references == | == External references == | ||
Latest revision as of 16:40, 29 April 2022
The aim was to design a complete tooltip cycle and thereby proof
that there are no fundamental roadblocks for diamondoid mechanosynthesis.
The results where favorable.
Related
- List of proposed tooltips for diamond mechanosynthesis
- Tooltip chemistry – Tooltip cycle – Piezochemical mechanosynthesis
- Resource molecules
- Why gemstone metamaterial technology should work in brief
Regarding experimental work mechanosynthesis has been crudely demonstrated on silicon (state 2021).
See: Silicon mechanosynthesis demonstration paper
This is all very far from an experimentally demonstrated tooltip cycle yet though.
(Note: throughput rate and fundamental mechanosynthetic capability can probably be developed separately and orthogonally from each other for the most part)
External references
- A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis (2008) from Robert A. Freitas Jr. and Ralph C. Merkle - Institute for Molecular Manufacturing, Palo Alto, CA 94301, USA
- A flow-chart extracted out of the minimal toolset paper.
- Wikipedia: Hydrogen atom abstraction
