Difference between revisions of "A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis (paper)"
From apm
(basic page + note on experimental demo) |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
that there are no fundamental roadblocks for diamondoid [[mechanosynthesis]]. <br> | that there are no fundamental roadblocks for diamondoid [[mechanosynthesis]]. <br> | ||
The results where favorable. | The results where favorable. | ||
| − | |||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
Revision as of 14:29, 30 May 2021
The aim was to design a complete tooltip cycle and thereby proof
that there are no fundamental roadblocks for diamondoid mechanosynthesis.
The results where favorable.
Related
- List of proposed tooltips for diamond mechanosynthesis
- Tooltip chemistry – Tooltip cycle – Pierochemical mechanosynthesis
- Resource molecules
Regarding experimental work mechanosynthesis has been crudely demonstrated on silicon (state 2021).
This is all very far from an experimentally demonstrated tooltip cycle yet though.
(Note: throughput rate and fundamental mechanosynthetic capability can probably be developed separately and orthogonally from each other for the most part)
External references
- A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis from Robert A. Freitas Jr. and Ralph C. Merkle - Institute for Molecular Manufacturing, Palo Alto, CA 94301, USA
- A flow-chart extracted out of the minimal toolset paper.
- Wikipedia: Hydrogen atom abstraction
