Difference between revisions of "A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis (paper)"
From apm
m (→Related: fixed tyo) |
m (→Related) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* [[List of proposed tooltips for diamond mechanosynthesis]] | * [[List of proposed tooltips for diamond mechanosynthesis]] | ||
| − | * [[Tooltip chemistry]] – [[Tooltip cycle]] – [[Piezochemical mechanosynthesis]] | + | * [[Tooltip chemistry]] – '''[[Tooltip cycle]]''' – [[Piezochemical mechanosynthesis]] |
* [[Resource molecule]]s | * [[Resource molecule]]s | ||
* [[Why gemstone metamaterial technology should work in brief]] | * [[Why gemstone metamaterial technology should work in brief]] | ||
Revision as of 20:01, 7 February 2022
The aim was to design a complete tooltip cycle and thereby proof
that there are no fundamental roadblocks for diamondoid mechanosynthesis.
The results where favorable.
Related
- List of proposed tooltips for diamond mechanosynthesis
- Tooltip chemistry – Tooltip cycle – Piezochemical mechanosynthesis
- Resource molecules
- Why gemstone metamaterial technology should work in brief
Regarding experimental work mechanosynthesis has been crudely demonstrated on silicon (state 2021).
See: Silicon mechanosynthesis demonstration paper
This is all very far from an experimentally demonstrated tooltip cycle yet though.
(Note: throughput rate and fundamental mechanosynthetic capability can probably be developed separately and orthogonally from each other for the most part)
External references
- A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis (2008) from Robert A. Freitas Jr. and Ralph C. Merkle - Institute for Molecular Manufacturing, Palo Alto, CA 94301, USA
- A flow-chart extracted out of the minimal toolset paper.
- Wikipedia: Hydrogen atom abstraction
