Difference between revisions of "Mechanosynthetic carbon dioxide splitting"
From apm
(added a todo and two links) |
(clarified formulation whats meant with oxygen as next element in focus) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[File:Carbon_dioxide_3D_spacefill.png|thumb|CPK model of carbon dioxide]] | [[File:Carbon_dioxide_3D_spacefill.png|thumb|CPK model of carbon dioxide]] | ||
| − | The application of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> removal (see: [[carbon dioxide collector unit]]) should give a strong incentive to make oxygen the next element of interest in the direct path research. [[Mechanosynthetic water splitting]] is needed too here. | + | The application of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> removal (see: [[carbon dioxide collector unit]]) should give a strong incentive to make oxygen the next element of interest (after carbon and hydrogen) in the [[direct path]] research. [[Mechanosynthetic water splitting]] is needed too here. |
'''Research needed:''' How needs the basic nine member diamondoid [[mechanosynthesis]] toolset be extended to be able to rip CO<sub>2</sub> apart (and use the oxygen then)? | '''Research needed:''' How needs the basic nine member diamondoid [[mechanosynthesis]] toolset be extended to be able to rip CO<sub>2</sub> apart (and use the oxygen then)? | ||
Revision as of 12:40, 30 May 2021
The application of atmospheric CO2 removal (see: carbon dioxide collector unit) should give a strong incentive to make oxygen the next element of interest (after carbon and hydrogen) in the direct path research. Mechanosynthetic water splitting is needed too here.
Research needed: How needs the basic nine member diamondoid mechanosynthesis toolset be extended to be able to rip CO2 apart (and use the oxygen then)?
(TODO: A detailed analysis of mechanosyntetic carbon dioxide splitting will be needed at some point. This reaction is of especial interest.)
