Difference between revisions of "Microcomponent subsystems"
From apm
(Created page with "A good '''design goal''' is to aim to '''make systems of diamondoid - microcomponents mergable''' such that many kinds of diamondoid metamaterials can freely be in...") |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
such that many kinds of [[diamondoid metamaterials]] can freely be interspersed | such that many kinds of [[diamondoid metamaterials]] can freely be interspersed | ||
and more complex ''microcomponent subsystems'' can be interwoven. | and more complex ''microcomponent subsystems'' can be interwoven. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Microcomponent subsystems can be: | ||
| + | * homogenous [[diamondoid metamaterials]] | ||
| + | * heterogenous | ||
| + | |||
| + | Examples for heterogenous subsystems are: | ||
| + | * [[nanomechanical computing]] systems | ||
| + | * component router systems of advanced nanotactiries | ||
| + | * other logistic systems with tree topology | ||
Revision as of 21:43, 13 January 2014
A good design goal is to aim to make systems of diamondoid - microcomponents mergable such that many kinds of diamondoid metamaterials can freely be interspersed and more complex microcomponent subsystems can be interwoven.
Microcomponent subsystems can be:
- homogenous diamondoid metamaterials
- heterogenous
Examples for heterogenous subsystems are:
- nanomechanical computing systems
- component router systems of advanced nanotactiries
- other logistic systems with tree topology
