Difference between revisions of "Analogies and their dangers"

Revision as of 19:23, 22 August 2018

The absolute non-circumventable necessity of analogies

Analogies are a necessity. We learn by analogies. When explaining new things to a child, one has to consider its mental model of the world and explain these new things in terms of analogies to parts of this pre-existing world-model.

Analogies are what establish relations between concepts. And in a philosophical sense one may see relations between concepts as that what creates reality itself.

The statement "Qumogliuplasts tribitate in case of erekitasis" is complete gibberish precisely because nobody has ever established any analogies which these words should point to. (Ok, the sentence has structure and sounds like molecular biology - there cannot be given an example that carries no information at all)

The dark side of analogies

The dark side of analogies is that they often invite or even seduce one to abuse them by applying them in areas beyond where they are applicable. In areas where the model they represent breaks down. It's an over-stretching of analogies without till rupture without recognizing the mistake.

Some analogies on this wiki

• Misleading biological analogies that should be avoided
• The drum analogy for atoms. See: The nature and shape of atoms
• The mechanoelectrical correspondence
• ...