Difference between revisions of "Microcomponent subsystems"
From apm
m |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
such that many kinds of [[diamondoid metamaterials]] can freely be interspersed | such that many kinds of [[diamondoid metamaterials]] can freely be interspersed | ||
and more complex ''microcomponent subsystems'' can be interwoven. | and more complex ''microcomponent subsystems'' can be interwoven. | ||
| + | |||
| + | As concrete example one can adjust the ratio between [[energy storage cells|energy storage]] and energy conversion microcomponents depending whether one prefers more energy storage density or more output power density. | ||
Microcomponent subsystems can be: | Microcomponent subsystems can be: | ||
Revision as of 19:10, 26 February 2015
A good design goal is to aim to make systems of diamondoid - microcomponents mergable such that many kinds of diamondoid metamaterials can freely be interspersed and more complex microcomponent subsystems can be interwoven.
As concrete example one can adjust the ratio between energy storage and energy conversion microcomponents depending whether one prefers more energy storage density or more output power density.
Microcomponent subsystems can be:
- homogenous diamondoid metamaterials
- heterogenous
Examples for heterogenous subsystems are:
- diamondoid heat pump systems
- nanomechanical computing systems
- component router systems of advanced nanofactories
- other logistic systems with tree topology
