Difference between revisions of "Dangers"
From apm
m |
(→Waste) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== Waste == | == Waste == | ||
− | Albeit [[technology level III|advanced APM]] has the potential to be an absolutely clean technology (since its primary waste products are only hot air and warm water) | + | Albeit [[technology level III|advanced APM]] has the potential to be an absolutely clean technology in production (since its primary waste products are only hot air and warm water) '''advanced APM would be a unprecedented wasteful technology in disposal if not built correctly''' since the products themselves must be considered waste once they become obsolete - and the products will become obsolete fast as we can see with today's pace of software improvement. Also the global production rate in mass or volume will be bigger since production will become so widespread and accessible. |
− | '''advanced APM would be a unprecedented wasteful technology if not built correctly''' since the products themselves must be considered waste once they become obsolete - and the products | + | |
− | * [[Recycling]] is not an option its an obligation that has to be thought of before creating APM systems that can produce products that don not biodegrade quickly | + | * '''[[Recycling]]''' is not an option its '''an obligation that has to be thought of before creating APM systems''' that can produce products that don not biodegrade quickly. |
+ | |||
+ | === Related === | ||
+ | |||
+ | * recomposable [[microcomponents]] | ||
+ | * The two recycling classes of products: The ones that can be completely burned to gasses (C,H,O,N,S) & The ones that produce slacks when burned (containing too: Si,Al,Ti,Fe,Na, and the wole remaining periodic table) | ||
+ | * amorphous slack of various elements is hard to deal with since ... | ||
+ | * there's no AP disassembly (at least its a lot harder to do than AP assembly) |
Revision as of 07:08, 21 February 2015
Dangers arising through the coming AP Technology are:
- non degrading waste recycling (envirounment)
- building up on flawed software design
- development of new weaponary (e.g. interfacial drive based kinetic energy weapons)
- easy production of explosives (e.g. solid sp3 nitrogen)
- sharp edges and splinters (health)
- social and economic dangers like too rapid and imbalanced economic change and rapidly and globally diclining birth rates
- uncontrolled replication [Todo: add the replication hexagon]
- [TODO add further]
- unethical perfectionism
On the other hand there are opportunities that should hopefully by far balance out those risks.
Waste
Albeit advanced APM has the potential to be an absolutely clean technology in production (since its primary waste products are only hot air and warm water) advanced APM would be a unprecedented wasteful technology in disposal if not built correctly since the products themselves must be considered waste once they become obsolete - and the products will become obsolete fast as we can see with today's pace of software improvement. Also the global production rate in mass or volume will be bigger since production will become so widespread and accessible.
- Recycling is not an option its an obligation that has to be thought of before creating APM systems that can produce products that don not biodegrade quickly.
Related
- recomposable microcomponents
- The two recycling classes of products: The ones that can be completely burned to gasses (C,H,O,N,S) & The ones that produce slacks when burned (containing too: Si,Al,Ti,Fe,Na, and the wole remaining periodic table)
- amorphous slack of various elements is hard to deal with since ...
- there's no AP disassembly (at least its a lot harder to do than AP assembly)