Difference between revisions of "Nanoscale style machinery at the macroscale"
From apm
m (→Related) |
m (→Related) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* [[Nonthermal self-assembly]] – this works well at the macroscale too | * [[Nonthermal self-assembly]] – this works well at the macroscale too | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | Second | + | Second context: |
* [[Physics change aware scale transposed prototyping]] | * [[Physics change aware scale transposed prototyping]] | ||
* [[Applicability of macro 3D printing for nanomachine prototyping]] | * [[Applicability of macro 3D printing for nanomachine prototyping]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:29, 9 March 2025
This page is about using the principles of natural nanomachinery (main focus self assembly by movement driven through intense shaking) for assembly at the macroscale.
For main obstacles see page: Diffusion slowdown blockade
Perhaps also to be covered: Cases where macroscale physics is more limiting compared to nanoscale physics in case of future artificial nanomachinery.
Related
- Diffusion slowdown blockade – a potentail hindrance in the incremental path when scaling up selfassembly levels
- Complementary page to: Macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale
This one is not related to many of the common misconceptions about atomically precise manufacturing though.
- Scaling law – selfassembly driven by shaking (even if artificially introduced) scales badly to the macroscale
- Nonthermal self-assembly – this works well at the macroscale too
Second context:
