Difference between revisions of "Gem-gum"
From apm
m (→⚠️ Related warning: linebreaks) |
m |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* '''[[Gemstone based metamaterial]]'''. Gem-gum as an intentionally paradoxical concrete example of <br>a [[mechanical metamaterial]] with vastly different properties to the base material. With a catchy name. | * '''[[Gemstone based metamaterial]]'''. Gem-gum as an intentionally paradoxical concrete example of <br>a [[mechanical metamaterial]] with vastly different properties to the base material. With a catchy name. | ||
− | * '''[[The defining traits of gem-gum-tec]]'''. What gem, gum, and gem-gum refers to. | + | * '''[[The defining traits of gem-gum-tec]]'''. What gem, gum, and gem-gum refers to. <br> Gem-gum-tech also called "[[gem based APM|gem(stone) based APM]]" here. |
== ⚠️ Related warning == | == ⚠️ Related warning == |
Revision as of 18:15, 4 May 2024
Disambiguation page
- Gemstone based metamaterial. Gem-gum as an intentionally paradoxical concrete example of
a mechanical metamaterial with vastly different properties to the base material. With a catchy name. - The defining traits of gem-gum-tec. What gem, gum, and gem-gum refers to.
Gem-gum-tech also called "gem(stone) based APM" here.
⚠️ Related warning
Be aware that:
⚠️ Diamondoid nanoscale machinery is not at all jelly like floppy
as molecular dynamics simulations may misleadingly suggest.
This is NOT what "gum" in "gem-gum" refers to. High simulations speeds are to blame.
For details see: Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements
Actually at nominal proposed speeds (few mm/s)
nanomachinery bends and deflects LESS from machine motions
than even everyday metal macroscale machinery does.
That is due to the scaling law of same relative deflections across scales.