Difference between revisions of "RepRec pick-and-place robots (GemGum)"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
m (→‎Macroscale prototypes: linebreaks)
(→‎No dependence on friction based self holding: some cleanup)
Line 94: Line 94:
 
== No dependence on friction based self holding ==
 
== No dependence on friction based self holding ==
  
−
A dedicated nanoscale friction element  
+
A dedicated nanoscale friction element:
−
* is more like a tuning fork that distributes its excitation by it's anharmonicity (deviation from linear restoring force)
+
* is solely used for deliberate energy dissipation
−
* is solely used for deliberate energy dissipation not friction self holding. It swerves a different purpose.
+
* can not beused for friction self holding
 +
* is more like a tuning fork in vacuum that after being plugged (see: [[snapback]]) distributes its excitation into overtones and eventually the mounting surface. <br>This "flowout" called dissipation (to more degrees of freedom) and is driven by the forks anharmonicity ~ deviation from linearity of the restoring force.
  
 
There is no friction at the nanoscale between atomically precise surfaces in the way as there is friction at the macroscale. <br>
 
There is no friction at the nanoscale between atomically precise surfaces in the way as there is friction at the macroscale. <br>
 
So screws won't hold in the same way as they do at the macroscale. <br>
 
So screws won't hold in the same way as they do at the macroscale. <br>
−
Matching up atomic surface waviness can hold things in place but that's a energetic snap holding not friction self holding.
+
Matching up atomic surface waviness can hold things in place, yes, but that's an energetic barrier rather than static friction.
  
 
== Bulky design ==
 
== Bulky design ==

Revision as of 12:16, 25 January 2023

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

In general context RepRec systems are (per definition) a class of self replicating pick and place robotic systems ...

  • that do not produce their own parts but instead use parts pre-produced by a different process
  • that do assemble copies (and improvements) of themselves from the same types of parts that they are themselves composed out of.

In the specific context of advanced atomically precise manufacturing i.e.
gemstone metamaterial technology RepRec systems ...

Closest currently existing project is:
"An architecture for universal construction via modular robotic components" by Matt Moses et.al. [1]
There are quite some major differences though to make it work in the context of nanoscale physics with crystolecules as building blocks.
More on that further below.

Huge differences to diamondoid molecular assembler concept

The self-replicative capability in RepRec systems is not to confuse with
the ultra compact self-contained selfreplicativity in the
outdated concept of molecular assemblers where self replication
is a necessary prerequisite for the bootstrapping of the technology.

In RepRec systems the situation is reversed.
Self-replicative capability is more an eventual consequence of bootstrapping towards
advanced productive nanosystem systems without having self-replicative capability yet.

There is no "proto (diamondoid) RepRec" concept like
there is the "proto(diamondoid) molecular assembler" concept.

Unlike molecular assemblers crystolecular RepRec systems ...

  • do not need to be ultra compact to be buildable via positional assembly nigh atom by atom in reasonable timescales.
  • do depend on pre-produced parts that is: Crystolecules ... (some caveats here)
  • do constitute only a part of an eventual advanced productive nanosystem
  • do have a modular static (but reconfigurable) scaffolding frame system an integral non-removable part of their system
  • may even depend of multiple different semi-mobile units to achieve full selfreplicativity (disributed selfreplicativity)

Advantages of reasonable compact selfrepicative capability

Remaining reasonable compactness of selfreplicativity in RepRec seems like a strong and good driver to
highly reusable/recyclable general purpouse parts and components.
Remaining compactness of self-replicativity in RepRec systems involves:

  • a nanofactory chips "pixel" being fully self-replicative not needing the whole chip
  • the second assembly level alone being having self-replicative capability not needing the third assembly level for it (not a strong constraint)

The results from such constraints may be well designed systematic sets component parts.
In a sense similarly to standard electrical components just for mechanical systems
(and thus richer as mechanical voltages aka forces come as vectors rather than scalars).

Standard mechanical components for generality and reusability rarely make sense at the macroscale as the overhead is to high.
Macroscale mechanical systems (like clockworks and transmission gearboxes) are small scale one off solutions amenable to heavy optimization.
Like a very specialized analog circuit in electronics.
Prototyping with legotechnic (which is not at all good system for the nanoscale for various reasons btw) may be one exception.

Standard mechanical components for generality and reusability do make a lot of sense for nanosystems
where the complexity approaches the one on that is present on the computer chips of today (2023).

Base block materials the design is aimed at

Reusable crystolecules

The design is:

Foldamer parts?

Pre self-assembled foldamer parts with high geometry might eventually work too as base parts.
Given they are stiff enough. But this is questionable. If it works it will be quite a bit bigger than in the crystolecule case.
Unfortunately the parts that structural DNA nanotechnology can make are almost certainly not stiff enough.

Macroscale prototypes

For prototyping functionality at the macroscale FDM 3D printing or resin 3D printing are possible options.
Of course one needs to keep an eye on: Applicability of macro 3D printing for nanomachine prototyping
Look at mechanical property transposition for comparability.

Eventual macroscopic use cases of the system (as home device beside a RepRap or as a device for truss construction in space)
can't be excluded but optimization for those applications is definitely not the design goal here.
heavy chains instead of drive belts and other design choices might make the system quite sub-optimal for those alternate application cases.

Key properties

Same as the ReChain frame systems that may serve as a basis.

Narrow range of part sizes

All parts are in a narrow size range.
There is not a range from very small connectors to very big plates.
Instead bigger parts are made up out of many smaller parts
This allows to keep all assembly activity to just a single (the second) assembly level.

No dependence on friction based self holding

A dedicated nanoscale friction element:

  • is solely used for deliberate energy dissipation
  • can not beused for friction self holding
  • is more like a tuning fork in vacuum that after being plugged (see: snapback) distributes its excitation into overtones and eventually the mounting surface.
    This "flowout" called dissipation (to more degrees of freedom) and is driven by the forks anharmonicity ~ deviation from linearity of the restoring force.

There is no friction at the nanoscale between atomically precise surfaces in the way as there is friction at the macroscale.
So screws won't hold in the same way as they do at the macroscale.
Matching up atomic surface waviness can hold things in place, yes, but that's an energetic barrier rather than static friction.

Bulky design

There are a few reasons for bulky design.

  • To compensate for the low stiffness of all materials at the nanoscale.
  • To make sure all the parts can be handled with robotics of only one (the second) assembly level. Giving a narrow size range between smallest and biggest parts.
  • The design happening at the lower end of the physically possible size scales. Details see below.

On bulkiness originating from designing on the lowermost physically possible size limit

When the functional crystolecule pieces are already at the lower end of what physics allows for, then pieces for connecting parts together cannot by yet smaller since this would make them smaller than an atom. This pushes the size of the connection mechanisms and similar up into the size scale of the parts they connect. This is very much unlike the macroscale where e.g. large pieces are often held together by screws, splint rings or other means that are quite small in relation.

A note on selfreplicativity

While with "second assembly level self replication" there is a medium compact form of self replication present
the self replicative capability is not as compact as in the case of the molecular assemblers approach.
Molecular assemblers are outdated because of too compact self-replications and the consequences thereof.

Choice of name

The name RepRec was chosen in analogy to the name RepRap (Replicating Rapid Prototyper)
that refers to partially self replicating 3D printers.

The name "RepRec" is:

  • a shorthand for "Replicating Recomposers".
  • a name for a whole class of robotic systems (akin to RepRap not referring to one specific 3D printer but a whole class of them)

Related

External Links

RepRec pick and place robots – on the RepRap wiki
There more kept in the context of usage at home in conjunction with a RepRap
which is actually not the primary design target.

Remotely related:
Project Quine:

Ambots:

Replimat:

Retrieved from "http://apm.bplaced.net/w/index.php?title=RepRec_pick-and-place_robots_(GemGum)&oldid=14136"