Difference between revisions of "Losses from mechanochemical reactions"
From apm
(basic page) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 14:32, 11 August 2022
(TODO: This still needs much closer investigation to arrive at more reasonable but still safe lower upper bounds)
Basically what always works is assuming the whole bond energy being dissipated across every mechanochemical reaction.
- This vastly overestimates dissipated heat.
- This still leads to practical (albeit slow) productive nanosystems
(wiki-TODO: Present the very crude results from Nanosystems here)
Related
- Generally: Tooltip chemistry
- For structure: Piezomechanosynthesis
- For pre-processing: Mechanosynthetic resource molecule splitting
- For energy: Chemomechanical converter
Present in bottom scale assembly lines in gem-gum factories Including:
- Molecular mills also mechanosynthesis core
- Tooltip preparation zone
- Loss / dissipation is proportional to: Atom placement frequency
Other heat generating mechanisms include:
- energetically partly irreversible Friction in gem-gum technology
- in principle energetically reversible entropotermal conversion
- ...
