Difference between revisions of "Microcomponent subsystems"
From apm
m |
m |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Examples for heterogenous subsystems are: | Examples for heterogenous subsystems are: | ||
* [[nanomechanical computing]] systems | * [[nanomechanical computing]] systems | ||
| − | * component router systems of advanced | + | * [[Advanced nanofactory design|component router systems]] of advanced nanofactories |
* other logistic systems with tree topology | * other logistic systems with tree topology | ||
Revision as of 21:00, 10 February 2014
A good design goal is to aim to make systems of diamondoid - microcomponents mergable such that many kinds of diamondoid metamaterials can freely be interspersed and more complex microcomponent subsystems can be interwoven.
Microcomponent subsystems can be:
- homogenous diamondoid metamaterials
- heterogenous
Examples for heterogenous subsystems are:
- nanomechanical computing systems
- component router systems of advanced nanofactories
- other logistic systems with tree topology
