Difference between revisions of "Electromechanical converter"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(Porting macroscale electrostatic machines to the nanoscale)
(References: added references to nanosystems – removed corresponding wikitodo)
Line 32: Line 32:
  
 
* [[Energy conversion]]
 
* [[Energy conversion]]
* {{wikitodo|Add reference to electrostatic motor in nanosystems}}
 
 
* [[Graphene]], [[Nanotubes]], [[Semi gemstone-like structure]]  
 
* [[Graphene]], [[Nanotubes]], [[Semi gemstone-like structure]]  
 
* [[Non mechanical technology path]]
 
* [[Non mechanical technology path]]
 +
 +
=== In the book "Nanosystems" ===
 +
 +
Treatment of electromechanical energy conversion <br>
 +
and electrostatics in general in [[Nanosystems]] (taken from it's glossary):
 +
----
 +
* Electrostatic actuators, 335, 336
 +
* Electrostatic motors, 336-341, 370
 +
* Electrostatic generators (DC), 336-341
 +
----
 +
* Electrostatic energy, scaling of, 30
 +
* Electrostatic force, scaling of, 29
 +
----
 +
* Elecrostatic fields, 29, 200
 +
* Elecrostatic interactions in MM2, 48, 200
 +
 +
Electromagnetic power densities <br>
 +
do not scale well down the nanoscale.
  
 
== Related ==
 
== Related ==

Revision as of 08:14, 15 June 2021

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

General

In Nanosystems the power densities that are to expect to be (at least) possible with
electrostatics based electromechanical conversion at the nanoscale are conservatively estimated.
The power densities predicted to be at least possible already are unbelievably high.

Porting macroscale electrostatic machines to the nanoscale

The scaling law for electrostatic performance is very favorable for such miniaturization.

  • Voltages become much lower (down to ~1V like in computer chips) – this still gives massive electric fields over nanoscale distances.
  • Currents become much higher due to massive device parallelity

Designs that might need not much changes:

  • pelletron
  • Wimshurst machine
  • The Gläser machine (or Lewandowski machine) [1] – cylindric Wimshurst machine
  • A small cylindric simplified Voss machine [2]
  • Lord Kelvin Replenisher [3]
  • Bennet's doubler

Machines needing obvious modifications for the nanoscale:

  • Kelvin water dropper
    Could that be done in a nanoscale version with shooting solid-state charged pellets?
  • Van de Graaff generator:
    Charge seperation would be done in rather different way.
    Well, avoiding rubber (since not a gemstone-like compound), it would essentially become a similar to a pelletron. (replicate nanoscale charge separation mechanism)

Alternative contacting

To avoid the need for graphite tunneling contacts which need quite some surface and dissipate some power a reziprocating drive could be electrically connected with flexing nanotube connections. The flex must be low enough to not disturb the electric properties (conductivity) of the nabotube too much.

References

In the book "Nanosystems"

Treatment of electromechanical energy conversion
and electrostatics in general in Nanosystems (taken from it's glossary):


  • Electrostatic actuators, 335, 336
  • Electrostatic motors, 336-341, 370
  • Electrostatic generators (DC), 336-341

  • Electrostatic energy, scaling of, 30
  • Electrostatic force, scaling of, 29

  • Elecrostatic fields, 29, 200
  • Elecrostatic interactions in MM2, 48, 200

Electromagnetic power densities
do not scale well down the nanoscale.

Related

External links

Here is a website with an extreme detailed collection of information regarding the history of electrostatic machines:
Electrostatic Machines written by by Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz.
Especially interresting seem

On wikipedia:

Videos: