Difference between revisions of "Nuclear fusion"
From apm
m (→General notes) |
m (→General notes) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* Thermal throughput bottleneck [[thermal energy transmission]] | * Thermal throughput bottleneck [[thermal energy transmission]] | ||
| − | * self repair of thermal and radiation damage | + | * self repair of thermal and [[radiation damage]] |
* [[isotope sorting]] (e.g. tuning fork method) & closed loop nuclear waste recycling | * [[isotope sorting]] (e.g. tuning fork method) & closed loop nuclear waste recycling | ||
* usage for spacecraft propulsion possible? - earth or space only? | * usage for spacecraft propulsion possible? - earth or space only? | ||
Revision as of 12:18, 31 May 2014
Most speculative potential applications
[Todo: fill this topic skeleton]
Types of fusion
pursuable:
- envirounmentally friendly
- low cost
- relatively small and lightweight
Magnetic enclosure
- reduction of weight
- limit for magnetic fields unclear (severe)
Inertial fusion
- macroscopic vibration damping
- neutral particle carriage acceleration
- highly symmetric enclosement (thermal and quantum mechanical uncertainty)
- low reflectivity of hydrogen - minimal isolating plasma shell thickness (severe!)
- fast cavity cleanout
- fast radiation seals
- carriage particle accelerators
General notes
- Thermal throughput bottleneck thermal energy transmission
- self repair of thermal and radiation damage
- isotope sorting (e.g. tuning fork method) & closed loop nuclear waste recycling
- usage for spacecraft propulsion possible? - earth or space only?
- Implications of Liouville's theorem or "why nuclear mechanosynthesis don't work" - detour over thermal step unavoidable
- surface power/(heat flor) density limit - capsule based thermal energy transport (asymmetric figure eight loop in tokamaks?) may move it further down to more tacklable values.
- consistent high temperature stable designs SiC (H-passivation?)
