Difference between revisions of "Exploratory engineering"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Exploratory engineering is the exclusively usage of well established knowledge to gain new knowledge about what is in principle doable. Not economically but physically. | |
| + | It allows one to probe the fundamental limits of technology but does not necessarily give hints how to get there. | ||
| − | A prime example of | + | '''Exploratory engineering It's not a science'''. |
| − | For | + | ''Science is a breadth search for new and highly '''unpredictable''' phenomena'' to gain masses of measurement data that can be used to improve and extend new and barely tested models. It requires a tight loop between hypothesis and measurement. |
| + | In the book "Radical Abundance" by E.K.Drexler the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant blind men and the elephant] are used for illustration. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Exploratory engineering is its polar opposite'''. | ||
| + | ''It is a depth search for highly '''predictable''' working designs'' | ||
| + | where at every step one of the best understood and most likely to work choices is taken. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Limiting oneself rigorously to well established knowledge (mathematical models) | ||
| + | enables one to predict certain things with considerable certainty | ||
| + | that are so far from our current capabilities that they can't yet be tried or be measured well. | ||
| + | Those things are not useless. They serve as a guiding target and allow preparatory development. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Conventional engineering is in between'''. | ||
| + | Certainty that a design will work is usually not the prime objective of engineering. | ||
| + | there is an optimal number of tests of physical prototypes to minimize cost and or maximize performance. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Example == | ||
| + | A prime example of successful exploratory engineering in history can be found in the preparations for making low earth orbit and beyond accessible. | ||
| + | For non-involved people without sufficient internal knowledge of the then present technological capabilities it understandably seemed lunatic to want to go to the moon. | ||
Advanced atomically precise technology ([[Main Page|APM]]) suffers from a similar situation. | Advanced atomically precise technology ([[Main Page|APM]]) suffers from a similar situation. | ||
| − | Thus one of the goals of this wiki is to provide such | + | Thus one of the goals of [[Main Page|this wiki]] is to provide such sufficient internal information in a way that's somewhat digest-able for the average scientifically interested reader. |
| + | |||
| + | == Note == | ||
| + | It's called exp'''lo'''ratory and not ex'''tra'''p'''ol'''atory engineering which wold make sense too - even more so perhaps. (levenshtein distance: 5) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == External links == | ||
| − | + | * Wikipedia: [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploratory_engineering] | |
[[Category:General]] | [[Category:General]] | ||
Revision as of 17:44, 25 May 2014
Exploratory engineering is the exclusively usage of well established knowledge to gain new knowledge about what is in principle doable. Not economically but physically. It allows one to probe the fundamental limits of technology but does not necessarily give hints how to get there.
Exploratory engineering It's not a science. Science is a breadth search for new and highly unpredictable phenomena to gain masses of measurement data that can be used to improve and extend new and barely tested models. It requires a tight loop between hypothesis and measurement. In the book "Radical Abundance" by E.K.Drexler the blind men and the elephant are used for illustration.
Exploratory engineering is its polar opposite. It is a depth search for highly predictable working designs where at every step one of the best understood and most likely to work choices is taken.
Limiting oneself rigorously to well established knowledge (mathematical models) enables one to predict certain things with considerable certainty that are so far from our current capabilities that they can't yet be tried or be measured well. Those things are not useless. They serve as a guiding target and allow preparatory development.
Conventional engineering is in between. Certainty that a design will work is usually not the prime objective of engineering. there is an optimal number of tests of physical prototypes to minimize cost and or maximize performance.
Example
A prime example of successful exploratory engineering in history can be found in the preparations for making low earth orbit and beyond accessible. For non-involved people without sufficient internal knowledge of the then present technological capabilities it understandably seemed lunatic to want to go to the moon.
Advanced atomically precise technology (APM) suffers from a similar situation. Thus one of the goals of this wiki is to provide such sufficient internal information in a way that's somewhat digest-able for the average scientifically interested reader.
Note
It's called exploratory and not extrapolatory engineering which wold make sense too - even more so perhaps. (levenshtein distance: 5)
External links
- Wikipedia: [1]
