Difference between revisions of "Gem-gum"
From apm
(→⚠️ Related warning: added image) |
m (→⚠️ Related warning: linebreaks) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Be aware that: <br> | Be aware that: <br> | ||
− | ⚠️ '''Diamondoid nanoscale machinery is not at all jelly like floppy as molecular dynamics simulations may misleadingly suggest.''' <br> | + | ⚠️ '''Diamondoid nanoscale machinery is not at all jelly like floppy''' <br> |
− | This is NOT what gum in gem-gum refers to. High simulations speeds are to blame. <br> | + | '''as molecular dynamics simulations may misleadingly suggest.''' <br> |
+ | This is NOT what "gum" in "gem-gum" refers to. High simulations speeds are to blame. <br> | ||
For details see: [[Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements]] <br> | For details see: [[Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements]] <br> | ||
− | <small>Actually at nominal proposed speeds (few mm/s) nanomachinery bends and deflects LESS from machine motions than even everyday metal | + | <small>Actually at nominal proposed speeds (few mm/s) <br> |
− | That | + | nanomachinery bends and deflects LESS from machine motions <br> |
+ | than even everyday metal macroscale machinery does. <br> | ||
+ | That is due to the scaling law of [[same relative deflections across scales]].</small> |
Revision as of 18:13, 4 May 2024
Disambiguation page
- Gemstone based metamaterial. Gem-gum as an intentionally paradoxical concrete example of
a mechanical metamaterial with vastly different properties to the base material. With a catchy name. - The defining traits of gem-gum-tec. What gem, gum, and gem-gum refers to.
⚠️ Related warning
Be aware that:
⚠️ Diamondoid nanoscale machinery is not at all jelly like floppy
as molecular dynamics simulations may misleadingly suggest.
This is NOT what "gum" in "gem-gum" refers to. High simulations speeds are to blame.
For details see: Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements
Actually at nominal proposed speeds (few mm/s)
nanomachinery bends and deflects LESS from machine motions
than even everyday metal macroscale machinery does.
That is due to the scaling law of same relative deflections across scales.