Difference between revisions of "Nanoscale actuators"
(added link to wikipedia page about: Fermi's golden rule) |
(all headlines one level down) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Where xxx is electrical, chemical, optical,thermal, … | Where xxx is electrical, chemical, optical,thermal, … | ||
− | + | = Actuators in early atomically precise manufacturing = | |
For early technology levels ([[technology level 0|level 0]] and [[technology level I|level 1]]) of the [[incremental path]] there are several options. | For early technology levels ([[technology level 0|level 0]] and [[technology level I|level 1]]) of the [[incremental path]] there are several options. | ||
− | + | == Early optical actuation == | |
This is about [[optomechanical converter]]s based on molecules that change shape in response to <bR> | This is about [[optomechanical converter]]s based on molecules that change shape in response to <bR> | ||
a change of electronic configuration in response to a photon lifting one (or more?) electron(s) to a higher energy molecular orbital. | a change of electronic configuration in response to a photon lifting one (or more?) electron(s) to a higher energy molecular orbital. | ||
− | + | == Optically activated shape changing molecules may easily be overloaded == | |
This exerts very little force. <br> | This exerts very little force. <br> | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
weak non-bonded interaction (way weaker than the covalent bond that gets flipped in orientation). | weak non-bonded interaction (way weaker than the covalent bond that gets flipped in orientation). | ||
− | + | == Forces on bonds will change Fermis golden rule for optically induced electronic state transitions == | |
'''Fermis golden rule''' for electronic transitions activated by incoming light. <br> | '''Fermis golden rule''' for electronic transitions activated by incoming light. <br> | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
{{todo|Investigate whether it has been investigated how mechanical loads on bonds influence Fermis golden rule.}} | {{todo|Investigate whether it has been investigated how mechanical loads on bonds influence Fermis golden rule.}} | ||
− | + | == Example molecules == | |
{{wikitodo|Add example molecules.}} | {{wikitodo|Add example molecules.}} | ||
− | + | == Early electrostatic actuation == | |
To note here is maybe: | To note here is maybe: | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
* changing salt concentrations for larger scale selfassembly or disassembly | * changing salt concentrations for larger scale selfassembly or disassembly | ||
− | + | == Nanoscale actuation by pressure == | |
Actuation by variations of pressure for foldamer systems has not been investigated by 2022 is seems.<br> | Actuation by variations of pressure for foldamer systems has not been investigated by 2022 is seems.<br> | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
the entire fully interlinked machine phase "mechanical circuitry". | the entire fully interlinked machine phase "mechanical circuitry". | ||
− | + | = Actuators in gem-gum tech = | |
At the level of [[gem-gum technology]]: | At the level of [[gem-gum technology]]: | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
* [[chemomechanical converters]] – basically specialized [[molecular mills]] just for the conversion of energy | * [[chemomechanical converters]] – basically specialized [[molecular mills]] just for the conversion of energy | ||
− | + | = Related = | |
* [[Energy conversion]] | * [[Energy conversion]] | ||
* [[Motor-muscle]] | * [[Motor-muscle]] | ||
− | + | = External links = | |
* Wikipedia: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%27s_golden_rule Fermi's golden rule] | * Wikipedia: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%27s_golden_rule Fermi's golden rule] |
Revision as of 11:06, 24 February 2022
This is basically about xxx-mechanical converters.
Where xxx is electrical, chemical, optical,thermal, …
Contents
Actuators in early atomically precise manufacturing
For early technology levels (level 0 and level 1) of the incremental path there are several options.
Early optical actuation
This is about optomechanical converters based on molecules that change shape in response to
a change of electronic configuration in response to a photon lifting one (or more?) electron(s) to a higher energy molecular orbital.
Optically activated shape changing molecules may easily be overloaded
This exerts very little force.
If a bond is under too much load optical actuation will likely not happen.
The right way to make optomechaniocal actuators from light activated molecules is likely to
organize light activated molecules collectively where each acts only against a
weak non-bonded interaction (way weaker than the covalent bond that gets flipped in orientation).
Forces on bonds will change Fermis golden rule for optically induced electronic state transitions
Fermis golden rule for electronic transitions activated by incoming light.
Mechanical loads on the bonds (bonds being represented by the electronic state of bonding molecular orbitals)
will likely change transition rates in non-trivial ways.
It should be possible (and already quite challenging) to make a first order linear approximation.
Hopefully a first order approximation will be sufficient for the forces and light to expect.
(TODO: Investigate whether it has been investigated how mechanical loads on bonds influence Fermis golden rule.)
Example molecules
(wiki-TODO: Add example molecules.)
Early electrostatic actuation
To note here is maybe:
(1) Conductive electrolyte can shield external electric off fields quite a bit, which is rather undesirable.
Fields are not shielded off fully though as working experiments show.
(2) Some early foldamer technologies like structural DNA nanotechnology may
not work in dried out conditions without water or other polar ion carrying solvent.
There where successful experiments of electrostatically actuating a rod of structural DNA nanotechnology
and this was orders of magnitude faster than all the preceding means of actuation by adding or (more difficult) removing chemical species like e.g.:
- adding (short) oligomer DNA strands for site-specific-locking after free thermal motion
- changing salt concentrations for larger scale selfassembly or disassembly
Nanoscale actuation by pressure
Actuation by variations of pressure for foldamer systems has not been investigated by 2022 is seems.
(wiki-TODO: Investigate whether actuation by pressure has been investigated in the context of foldamer technology.)
There where some proposals in conjunction with the now long outdated molecular assembler concept of using pistons for actuation of nanorobotics. Potential issues are:
(A) A naive implementation has only one single communication channel and does global broadcasting to all nanomachinery.
(B) Thermal motion fluctuations in actuation may be more pronounced.
The smaller the pistons the less the impacts of the gas/fluid molecules average out.
Though the rotor of an electrostatic motor is also subject to at least one thermal engery packet (1/2*kBT)?
This statement may be wrong. Stuff to think about.
I short: One will want to link together as much of machine phase as stiffly as possible in order to
get as close down to the theoretical lower limit of (1/2*kBT) as possible for
the entire fully interlinked machine phase "mechanical circuitry".
Actuators in gem-gum tech
At the level of gem-gum technology:
- crystolecule based electrostatic motors will be able to feature exceptionally high power densities (Source Nanosystems).
- chemomechanical converters – basically specialized molecular mills just for the conversion of energy
Related
External links
- Wikipedia: Fermi's golden rule