Difference between revisions of "The finger problems"
From apm
m (→Related: reorder for most important ones atop) |
(→Related: updated to new name & bold) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
'''The overlooked ones:''' | '''The overlooked ones:''' | ||
* [[Jittery finger problem]] (See also: [[Thermal motion]]) | * [[Jittery finger problem]] (See also: [[Thermal motion]]) | ||
− | * [[Sloppy finger problem]] (See also: [[Stiffness]]) | + | * [[Sloppy finger problem]] (zero restoring force cases in protein side-chains) |
+ | * [[Wobbly finger problem]] (See also: [[Stiffness]]) | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
* [[Macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale]] | * [[Macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale]] | ||
− | * [[Common misconceptions about atomically precise manufacturing]] | + | * [[How macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale outperforms its native scale]] |
+ | * [[Common misconceptions about atomically precise manufacturing]] (older page) | ||
+ | * '''[[Common critique towards diamondoid atomically precise manufacturing and technology]]''' | ||
---- | ---- | ||
* [[Accidentally suggestive]] | * [[Accidentally suggestive]] |
Latest revision as of 12:18, 11 February 2024
(wiki-TODO: Add historic context)
The classic ones:
The overlooked ones:
- Jittery finger problem (See also: Thermal motion)
- Sloppy finger problem (zero restoring force cases in protein side-chains)
- Wobbly finger problem (See also: Stiffness)
Related
- Macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale
- How macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale outperforms its native scale
- Common misconceptions about atomically precise manufacturing (older page)
- Common critique towards diamondoid atomically precise manufacturing and technology