Difference between revisions of "Energy storage problem"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "'''todo''' upload scalable svg version == State of the art == Today (2015) humankind still mainly uses fossile fuel...")
 
(added limits section)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[File:energy-management-complete.png|512px|thumb|right|'''todo''' upload scalable svg version]]
+
{{Template:Stub}}
 +
'''Advanced [[mechanosynthesis]] can provide today's missing link of efficient chemomechanical conversion'''. This makes long term storage of huge amounts of energy possible. Additionally chemical energy is easier to transport than electrical energy - even today (oil tankers).
  
−
== State of the art ==
+
== Limits ==
  
−
Today (2015) humankind still mainly uses fossile fuel for energy.
+
Unlike other performance specs like transmittable power density.
−
In europe regenerative energy sources are on the rise and already provide some noticeable fraction of the energy.
+
The energy density of chemical energy storage is (with gasoline and explosives as good examples) pretty much at it's limits with our current (2016) crude technology.  
−
Regenerative energy faces several problems though.
+
−
The main one is that current non atomically precise technology isn't capable of storing massive amounts of energy efficiently and durably at any location.
+
−
Beside that for wind turbine generators currently big amounts of rare earth elements from china are needed
+
−
Production of solar cells needs agressive chemicaly although organic ones are in development.
+
  
−
== Energy management of nature and human (today and tomorrow) ==
+
Advanced atomically precise technology allows now forms of chemical energy storage that at the cost of slightly lower energy density are far safer and allow energy conversion efficiencies very near 100%.
  
−
Lets look at how energy is managed by nature how humanity does it today and what would be a desirable state we want to move our energy management to.
+
For energy densities higher than chemical only nuclear is possible.
 +
How and in how far advanced atomically precise technology may enable us using some nuclear physics as a bidirectional battery is very unclear at this moment (2016). See [[APM and nuclear technology]] for related highly speculative thoughts.
  
−
== Nature ==
+
== Related ==
  
−
All energy originally stems from nuclear sources either the sun or radioactive decay in the earths core.
+
* For more details see: [[Global scale energy management]]
−
The suns first converts nuclear to thermal energy (a thermonuclear conversion) and then the termal energy to photonic energy (a photothermal conversion - via Stefan Boltzmanns radiation law). On earth this photonic energy gets either captured by photosynthesis (a photochemical energy conversion - with a little hidden electrical intermediate step) or it gets converted back to heat again (again photothermal). This lower level heat may drive winds via pressure gradients (a thermomechanical conversion) and vaporize water (partially a thermoenrropic conversion). Wind convections may then lift up water vapor and water droplets in clouds (a mechanogravitative conversion). When the water finally rains down and flows down rivers it is converted back to thermal energy that is so much devalutaed that it becomes practically unusable. At the end it is becomes irradiated as infraread light at night into the three kelvin cold space.
+
* [[Energy storage cell]]
−
 
+
* [[Chemomechanical converters]]
−
== Human (today) ==
+
−
 
+
−
== Human (tomorrow) ==
+

Latest revision as of 19:40, 15 November 2016

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

Advanced mechanosynthesis can provide today's missing link of efficient chemomechanical conversion. This makes long term storage of huge amounts of energy possible. Additionally chemical energy is easier to transport than electrical energy - even today (oil tankers).

Limits

Unlike other performance specs like transmittable power density. The energy density of chemical energy storage is (with gasoline and explosives as good examples) pretty much at it's limits with our current (2016) crude technology.

Advanced atomically precise technology allows now forms of chemical energy storage that at the cost of slightly lower energy density are far safer and allow energy conversion efficiencies very near 100%.

For energy densities higher than chemical only nuclear is possible. How and in how far advanced atomically precise technology may enable us using some nuclear physics as a bidirectional battery is very unclear at this moment (2016). See APM and nuclear technology for related highly speculative thoughts.

Related

Retrieved from "http://apm.bplaced.net/w/index.php?title=Energy_storage_problem&oldid=5090"