Difference between revisions of "Keysholes for microcomponent disassembly"
(basic page) |
(removed the stub marker) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{wikitodo|Add some illustrative image.}} |
| + | |||
A simple safety system of mechanical locks to disassemble microcomponents. <br> | A simple safety system of mechanical locks to disassemble microcomponents. <br> | ||
A bit like a keyhole on a door needing a matching physical key for opening it. <br> | A bit like a keyhole on a door needing a matching physical key for opening it. <br> | ||
That of course is just a naive analogy though. <br> | That of course is just a naive analogy though. <br> | ||
Actual implementations may look quite a bit different. <br> | Actual implementations may look quite a bit different. <br> | ||
| + | Maybe like a QR code grid to bress in a certain parrern and sequence?? <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Avoinding keyhole overkill == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Only a protective outer layer === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Only the outermost shell needs this protection agains disassembly. <bb> | ||
| + | Skin protecting against viruses is a self suggesting biaoanalogy. <br> | ||
| + | Be careful with [[Misleading biological analogies that should be avoided|those]] though. <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | If attackers are to expect that try to rip open the protective outerlayer by brute force <br> | ||
| + | then this calls for [[defensive weaponry]] instead. Dire szenario. <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | === NOT a key on each and every microcomponents of the protective outer layer === | ||
| + | |||
| + | LIFO (last in first out) form closing assembly startegies <br> | ||
| + | allow one to have only a few key-stones that need locks. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == A note on the here assumed very high tech advancedness == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Note that this is for a quite an advanced state of the technology <br> | ||
| + | where malicious hardware attampting [[disassembly attacks]] <br> | ||
| + | has become a serious enough problem that neeeds dealing with. | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
| Line 16: | Line 40: | ||
* [[Self limitation for safety]] | * [[Self limitation for safety]] | ||
* [[dangers]] (& [[opportunities]]) | * [[dangers]] (& [[opportunities]]) | ||
| + | * A variant of the [[grey goo horror fable]] (Stretching it quite far. Better call it [[disassembly attack war]] maybe?) where malicious [[mobile robotic device]]s at various scales do coordinated [[disassembly attack]]s on an enemy to make more of themselves. Basically war at the highest possible (today imaginable) technology level with aspects of salvaging captured enemy resources for war furthering war ambitions. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:04, 4 May 2024
(wiki-TODO: Add some illustrative image.)
A simple safety system of mechanical locks to disassemble microcomponents.
A bit like a keyhole on a door needing a matching physical key for opening it.
That of course is just a naive analogy though.
Actual implementations may look quite a bit different.
Maybe like a QR code grid to bress in a certain parrern and sequence??
Contents
Avoinding keyhole overkill
Only a protective outer layer
Only the outermost shell needs this protection agains disassembly. <bb>
Skin protecting against viruses is a self suggesting biaoanalogy.
Be careful with those though.
If attackers are to expect that try to rip open the protective outerlayer by brute force
then this calls for defensive weaponry instead. Dire szenario.
NOT a key on each and every microcomponents of the protective outer layer
LIFO (last in first out) form closing assembly startegies
allow one to have only a few key-stones that need locks.
A note on the here assumed very high tech advancedness
Note that this is for a quite an advanced state of the technology
where malicious hardware attampting disassembly attacks
has become a serious enough problem that neeeds dealing with.
Related
- Disassembly attack e.g. via Microcomponent recomposer microbots or Mobile mesoscale robotic devicees
- Safety towards and with gem based APM
- Self limitation for safety
- dangers (& opportunities)
- A variant of the grey goo horror fable (Stretching it quite far. Better call it disassembly attack war maybe?) where malicious mobile robotic devices at various scales do coordinated disassembly attacks on an enemy to make more of themselves. Basically war at the highest possible (today imaginable) technology level with aspects of salvaging captured enemy resources for war furthering war ambitions.
