Difference between revisions of "Gem-gum"
From apm
(→⚠️ Related warning: added image) |
(factored out the section on intuition onto its own page) |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* '''[[Gemstone based metamaterial]]'''. Gem-gum as an intentionally paradoxical concrete example of <br>a [[mechanical metamaterial]] with vastly different properties to the base material. With a catchy name. | * '''[[Gemstone based metamaterial]]'''. Gem-gum as an intentionally paradoxical concrete example of <br>a [[mechanical metamaterial]] with vastly different properties to the base material. With a catchy name. | ||
| − | * '''[[The defining traits of gem-gum-tec]]'''. What gem, gum, and gem-gum refers to. | + | * '''[[The defining traits of gem-gum-tec]]'''. What gem, gum, and gem-gum refers to. <br> Gem-gum-tech also called "[[gem based APM|gem(stone) based APM]]" here. |
== ⚠️ Related warning == | == ⚠️ Related warning == | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Be aware that: <br> | Be aware that: <br> | ||
| − | ⚠️ '''Diamondoid nanoscale machinery is not at all jelly like floppy as molecular dynamics simulations may misleadingly suggest.''' <br> | + | ⚠️ '''Diamondoid nanoscale machinery is not at all jelly like floppy''' <br> |
| − | This is NOT what gum in gem-gum refers to. High simulations speeds are to blame. <br> | + | '''as molecular dynamics simulations may misleadingly suggest.''' <br> |
| + | This is NOT what "gum" in "gem-gum" refers to. High simulations speeds are to blame. <br> | ||
For details see: [[Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements]] <br> | For details see: [[Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements]] <br> | ||
| − | <small>Actually at nominal proposed speeds (few mm/s) nanomachinery bends and deflects LESS from machine motions than even everyday metal | + | <small>Actually at nominal proposed speeds (few mm/s) <br> |
| − | That | + | nanomachinery bends and deflects LESS from machine motions <br> |
| + | than even everyday metal macroscale machinery does. <br> | ||
| + | That is due to the scaling law of [[same relative deflections across scales]].</small> | ||
| + | |||
| + | === A better intuition: hyper-spring-steel, super-magnets, and sometimes giant forces, all at snail speed === | ||
| + | |||
| + | See page: [[A better intuition for diamondoid nanomachinery than jelly]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:35, 18 October 2024
Disambiguation page
- Gemstone based metamaterial. Gem-gum as an intentionally paradoxical concrete example of
a mechanical metamaterial with vastly different properties to the base material. With a catchy name. - The defining traits of gem-gum-tec. What gem, gum, and gem-gum refers to.
Gem-gum-tech also called "gem(stone) based APM" here.
⚠️ Related warning
Be aware that:
⚠️ Diamondoid nanoscale machinery is not at all jelly like floppy
as molecular dynamics simulations may misleadingly suggest.
This is NOT what "gum" in "gem-gum" refers to. High simulations speeds are to blame.
For details see: Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements
Actually at nominal proposed speeds (few mm/s)
nanomachinery bends and deflects LESS from machine motions
than even everyday metal macroscale machinery does.
That is due to the scaling law of same relative deflections across scales.
A better intuition: hyper-spring-steel, super-magnets, and sometimes giant forces, all at snail speed
See page: A better intuition for diamondoid nanomachinery than jelly
