Difference between revisions of "Copyfication square"
From apm
m (Apm moved page Copification square to Copyfication square: spelling error) |
m (fixed spelling) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
{{site specific term}} | {{site specific term}} | ||
− | " | + | "Copyfication" for "immobile replication" or "immobile self-replication". |
== The four sides of the immobile self-replication square == | == The four sides of the immobile self-replication square == | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
− | * [[reproduction hexagon]] - [[replication pentagon]] - [[ | + | * [[reproduction hexagon]] - [[replication pentagon]] - [[copyfication square]] |
* [[self replication]] | * [[self replication]] |
Revision as of 11:05, 17 May 2021
"Copyfication" for "immobile replication" or "immobile self-replication".
The four sides of the immobile self-replication square
There are four necessary requirements on selfreplicativity for a gemstone metamaterial on-chip factory.
Needed are:
- replication capability
- building block availability
- energy supply
- blueprint data mobility (a mere digital access to a central copy is sufficient, some redundancy is advisable though for resiliency)
Not needed are:
- replicator mobility -- needed for the (outdated) molecular assembler concept
- sufficient adaptivity -- needed only by biological life
Blueprint data mobility
A note on "blueprint data mobility":
The biological example of DNA with a full nanomechanically encoded datastorage copy in
every single cell is ridiculously inefficient and nothing we would want to mimic in artificial systems for manufacturing.
Related
- reproduction hexagon - replication pentagon - copyfication square
- self replication