Difference between revisions of "Stiffness"
(semi decent initial version of the page) |
m (→Sufficient lattice scaled stiffness for early low stiffness systems) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Usage of self assembled [[atomic precision|atomically precise]] base parts (aka "vitamins") allow for less stringent conditions on stiffness. | Usage of self assembled [[atomic precision|atomically precise]] base parts (aka "vitamins") allow for less stringent conditions on stiffness. | ||
Only the '''lattice scaled stiffness''' must be sufficient for block based self centering assembly (which is not really callable "mechanosynthesis" yet). | Only the '''lattice scaled stiffness''' must be sufficient for block based self centering assembly (which is not really callable "mechanosynthesis" yet). | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{todo|Add external link to lattice scaled stiffness explanation page.}} | ||
== How stiffness scales with size == | == How stiffness scales with size == | ||
Revision as of 15:59, 29 June 2017
Gradually introducing sufficient stiffness into atomically precise structures is of key importance for bootstrapping the far term goal of advanced nanofactories through a series of earlier increasingly more powerful atomically precise productive nanosystems.
Sufficient stiffness is:
- necessary for sufficient suppression of thermal vibration amplitudes.
First sufficiently below the size of pre-produced atomically precise blocks and self-alignment/self-centering slots.
Later sufficiently below atom to atom distance to exponentially suppress misplacement errors. - necessary to archive atomic resolution not just atomic precision
- necessary for making force applying mechanosynthesis possible
- one reason for the choice of diamondoid compounds as good base material / far term target material
Contents
Sufficient lattice scaled stiffness for early low stiffness systems
Usage of self assembled atomically precise base parts (aka "vitamins") allow for less stringent conditions on stiffness. Only the lattice scaled stiffness must be sufficient for block based self centering assembly (which is not really callable "mechanosynthesis" yet).
(TODO: Add external link to lattice scaled stiffness explanation page.)
How stiffness scales with size
The scaling law for stiffness is such that smaller structures have lower stiffness ("softer"). (TODO: Add math and graph.) Nanoscale diamond e.g. has a compliance that when interpreted at the macroscale lies in a very intuitively understandable range.
Influence on manipulator design
The choice of geometric design of nano-manipulators must be taken such that the compliance of the material is compensated for. Long skinny serial mechanics robotic arms (like many industry robots on the macroscale) are a bad choice for the deep nanoscale. Bulky parallel mechanic manipulators are a good choice.
General
The SI unit of stiffness is newtons per square meter (N/m2)
The inverse of stiffness is called compliance. Not softness which would be the inverse of hardness.
