Difference between revisions of "Gem-gum"
From apm
m |
(factored out the section on intuition onto its own page) |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
than even everyday metal macroscale machinery does. <br> | than even everyday metal macroscale machinery does. <br> | ||
That is due to the scaling law of [[same relative deflections across scales]].</small> | That is due to the scaling law of [[same relative deflections across scales]].</small> | ||
+ | |||
+ | === A better intuition: hyper-spring-steel, super-magnets, and sometimes giant forces, all at snail speed === | ||
+ | |||
+ | See page: [[A better intuition for diamondoid nanomachinery than jelly]] |
Latest revision as of 19:35, 18 October 2024
Disambiguation page
- Gemstone based metamaterial. Gem-gum as an intentionally paradoxical concrete example of
a mechanical metamaterial with vastly different properties to the base material. With a catchy name. - The defining traits of gem-gum-tec. What gem, gum, and gem-gum refers to.
Gem-gum-tech also called "gem(stone) based APM" here.
⚠️ Related warning
Be aware that:
⚠️ Diamondoid nanoscale machinery is not at all jelly like floppy
as molecular dynamics simulations may misleadingly suggest.
This is NOT what "gum" in "gem-gum" refers to. High simulations speeds are to blame.
For details see: Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements
Actually at nominal proposed speeds (few mm/s)
nanomachinery bends and deflects LESS from machine motions
than even everyday metal macroscale machinery does.
That is due to the scaling law of same relative deflections across scales.
A better intuition: hyper-spring-steel, super-magnets, and sometimes giant forces, all at snail speed
See page: A better intuition for diamondoid nanomachinery than jelly