Difference between revisions of "Hundredfold smaller frictionlosses from tenfold slowdown"
From apm
(basic page - mostly related section) |
m (→Related) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* '''[[Optimal sublayernumber for minimal friction]]''' | * '''[[Optimal sublayernumber for minimal friction]]''' | ||
* [[Compenslow]] | * [[Compenslow]] | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | * [[Non size-scale scaling law]] | ||
| + | * [[Scaling law (disambiguation)]] | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | * [[Mesoscale friction]]: Possibly a limit to that scaling law as <br>macroscale friction does not scale with speed and slide-bearing-area <br>but rather with normal-load-force only. Times friction coefficient times speed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Scaling law]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:22, 5 October 2022
Dynamic friction (as present in atomically precise diamondoid slide bearings) scales to the square with speed.
So there is a lot to be gained by slowing down.
And deliberate slowdown at the lower assembly levels slowdown can be afforded
due to higher throughput of smaller machinery.
Related
- Friction
- Friction in gem-gum technology
- Deliberate slowdown at the lower assembly levels
- Increasing bearing area to decrease friction
- Optimal sublayernumber for minimal friction
- Compenslow
- Mesoscale friction: Possibly a limit to that scaling law as
macroscale friction does not scale with speed and slide-bearing-area
but rather with normal-load-force only. Times friction coefficient times speed.
