Protein carpentry

From apm
Revision as of 09:49, 26 April 2026 by Apm (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

"Protein carpentry", term coined by Eric K Drexler.
High stiffness high symmetry (high density functionalizabe) protein construction kits.

Overview

Basically getting something similar to Structural DNA nanotechnology (SDN) but with proteins.

Main advantaged compared to SDN:

  • higher stiffness (core backbone possibly even positionally atomically precise at 300K)
  • much higher density for functional attachment points
  • possibly even vacuum stability

difficult to compare tradeoffs: protein …

  • primary structure (backbone & sidechains) is smaller than DNA (thus the much more dense attachment points)
  • secondary structure (local molecular motifs like alpha helices & beta sheets) – used for stiffness
  • tertiary structure (protein shape) is similar or bigger) – used for geometry
  • qaternary structure (inter protein assembly) is larger than SDN voxels

Particularly interesting (a especially stiff) classes of proteins reuse the secondary structure as the tertiary structure

Discovered branches

Basic protein LEGO

Just small sets of still small size orthogonally binding proteins.
Overall focus: Expanding the kinematic loopdownward and inward.

Just building blocks without side-chain functionalities

Funding issue: High cost & no near term economic value.

Functional block construction kit approach

Main page: Functional block construction kit approach

Basic "Protein LEGO":

  • Focus on binding/sensing not catalyzing
  • No active or passive motion here

Catalysis construction kit approach

The Functional block construction kit approach but extended.

  • aiming at not just binding/sensing but also catalysis
  • possibly focus on passive or active motion here
    (role of actively driven motion on catalysis still contended in Sic community)

Foldamer robot approach (incremental path)

Main page: Foldamer robot approach (incremental path)
Overall focus: Expanding the kinematic loopupward and outward.

Aiming to scale capability to bigger sets of bigger size orthogonally binding proteins before focus on functionalization.

Seems (2019 … 2026 …) this is gradually and accidentally happening in research that is
not dedicatedly focused towards advanced APM i.e. not dedicatedly focused on
usage of proteins to get beyond the material of just proteins ASAP.

Advanced function carrying protein carpentry

For expanding the kinematic loop this very pushingly and relatively early tries to combines: The "upward and outward" and "downward and inward" scaling aspects.

Foldamer printer

Main page: Foldamer printer approach (incremental path)

A concept of xyz assembly satage like a 3D printer but simplifies by site activation an flow in flush by feedstock to avert complexities of feedstock delivery and pickup.

Intended usage is in solution. These devices may or may not be surface bound.

Challenges:

  • Still way beyond current capabilities (2026)
  • Way past suspense of disbelief of scientific community (experience 2019)

Modular molecular composite nanosystem

Main page: Modular molecular composite nanosystem

A distributed system of protein (foldamer) mechanisms.
Most likely on a flat chip (but it could be surface anchored or free floating 3D aggregates too.

Flat on chip for: – analytic access (e.g. confocal microscopy)
eventual pass-over to a mixed path that is critically dependent on flat on surface architectures
… The direct path analog to join up with is the Early diamondoid nanosystem pixel (direct path)

It may contain other foldamer techologies than just proteins.
Eventually transitioning to better stiffer aterials up the technology levels.

Some parts may eventually more or less resemble the precedingly described foldamer printers.

Still in solution maybe transitioning to dry.
SDN is mist likely breaking when dry so that would be out by then.

Related